Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Nowadays, there are contradictory thoughts and believes regarding what students should learn and study at university. One set of people believes that students should not study whatever they desire; while others disagree. From my vantage point, students should have the freedom to study what they are interested in.
There are varies fruitful professions in the field of science and technology that offers fancy perks and prosperous career. According to the above statement, it is thought by many that, rather than studying one subject it is logical to study which could initially lead to a wealthy career and handsome salary. For instance, In my current firm, those who have degrees related to science and technology have eye bugling payrolls and incentives. Overall, there is no doubt that these subjects could potentially be a money-making occupation but other subjects are also valuable.
Each human being possesses a distinctive set of innate skills and talents which should be allowed to bloom and find its way into the right path to success. It has been proven that those who follow their passion and talent could overcome all obstacles and become the best in their own field. To illustrate, Rolando is the example of a person who followed his talent and became the most famous player in the sports industry. Furthermore, if all students learn science and technology, this will lead to many problems because the world needs professionals with numerous skills and expertise.
In conclusion, this essay discussed why students should be free to focus on whatever subject they like rather than concentrating only on the subject which is related to technology and science. From a practical standpoint, freedom of choice should be given to students.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-17 | Farhad1010 | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Farhad1010 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Farhad1010 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Farhad1010 | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | Farhad1010 | 84 | view |
- Government should spend more money on education than on recreation and sports Do you agree or disagree with this statement 88
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and g 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and gi 73
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study a subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both views and g 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subject that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology. Discuss both view and give 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 407, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'sports'' or 'sport's'?
Suggestion: sports'; sport's
...nd became the most famous player in the sports industry. Furthermore, if all students ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, regarding, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1492.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 282.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29078014184 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68979754152 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.599290780142 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7215254053 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.769230769 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6923076923 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402912841622 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126909270298 0.084324248473 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0943710120574 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.229610167822 0.151304729494 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0889804822218 0.056905535591 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.