Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Higher education is an essential tool for building the advance and successive future. Some believe students should allow choosing subjects in their preference. While others argue that they should force to learn what benefits for future development. But I strongly believe everyone must be given an opportunity to study what they prefer the most.
Many people ought to believe that following advanced and sophisticated curriculum such as medicine, engineering and information technology will benefit. There are specific, key areas of studies given more opportunities to take part in highly demanded advanced fields of research and development. For instance, research done in the US and Europe, it is found that many pupils are urged to enroll in courses related to science and technology by their institutions. Unless they study those subjects in the future success of students and the world might get slower.
In spite of these arguments, I believe that university students have to be given the opportunity to master the subjects they are fond of. For example, If people underestimated art and literature in the past, we would not get the possibility of appreciating modern art by Picasso and classic novels like "Les miserable".So it is vital to learn those as well to attain creative and artistic minds to build a better perspective. The imagination plays a vital role in imaging what would be the forthcoming earth looks like. Thus, modern society has given, the subjects related to art and literature a lesser value in terms of shaping the coming world. If without the influence of these experts journey to the better and the humane futuristic world is unimaginable.
In conclusion, it is true to some extent that we need the student likely to participate in science and technology-related higher studies, whereas following what they most fond of is more important to build a better futuristic earth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-22 | mahyarr | 89 | view |
| 2021-10-31 | Nguyễn Thị Phương Huỳnh | 60 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | Kamran2555 | 73 | view |
| 2021-09-28 | Kamran2555 | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-05 | quynhhuong656 | 79 | view |
- The internet is a great source of information and has opened up opportunities for people to learn all over the world is all information reliable on the internet what could be done to control information online 78
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 73
- You have eaten at a restaurant and it was such a terrible experience that you have decided to inform the manager by letter of what happened and that you want your money back 1 Describe the problem 2 Explain why you are unhappy 3 Say what you would like to 73
- Some people say that technologies such as mobile phones is disrupting social interaction Do you agree or disagree 92
- Some people think that the best way to stay fit is by joining a gym while others think doing everyday activities such as walking and climbing stairs is sufficient Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 330, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: So
...c novels like 'Les miserable'.So it is vital to learn those as well to a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in spite of, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1618.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25324675325 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01441412687 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.555194805195 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.2088202909 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.571428571 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.64285714286 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346230295864 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112916705904 0.084324248473 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0798792709702 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195811698534 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515765831123 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.