Some people think the best way to solve global environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel.
To what extent do you agree?
There is an issue about the influence of oil price on the ecology. Some ecologists suggest that boosting the gasoline price is the most effective method to improve the poor condition of the environment. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with reasons why some ecologists state that a rise in the fuel price will bring the greatest benefit to the environment. The first reason is that the number of cars running on petrol will decline. The traffic on the roads will gradually diminish, because a growing number of drivers will be unable to purchase prohibitively costly fuel. As a result, the amount of carbon dioxide will decrease significantly. Another reason is that the importance of alternative sources of energy will grow. More companies will begin to research into the environmentally friendly sources and, subsequently, gain that they will become competitive in the energy market. Furthermore, car manufacturers will devise ways to convert traditional cars into energy-saving one. They will also transform conventional engines into energy-efficient ones, so that driver will be able to fill their two times less fuel than usual, which will reduce harmful fumes in the atmosphere.
However, some scientists of global warming argue that high cost of petrol will have insignificant effect on environmental pollution. Firstly, most of the oil companies will supply the energy market with more fuel. The higher the price for oil will become, the more areas of oil companies will start to develop, so many investors will choose to invest in petroleum market rather than in alternative energy. Petroleum producers will also hamper the development of alternative engines. They may create a great deal of obstacles to green-energy companies, since they will be reluctant to lose their share in the fuel industry. The complete replacement of traditional cars will linger for long time. The majority car drivers, who are poor people, will not abandon their cars immediately for ecofriendly ones, so the improvement of air quality will stretch for many years.
In conclusion, although some ecologists advocate that expensive petroleum will be the best solution to deal with the polluted ecology, I think that it will only course the minimum positive impact on it for the above mentioned reasons.
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? 78
- With a growing population, many people believe that we should focus on more genetically modified foods. What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing this? 67
- As a result of tourism and the increasing number of people traveling, there is an growing demand for more flights.What problems does this have on the environment?What measures could be taken to solve the problems? 89
- Young people these days tend to be less polite and respectful than in the past. Causes and solutions. 78
- With the development of online, there is no future for the radio.To what extent do you agree? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, so, i think, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 25.0 7.85571142285 318% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26954177898 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88276161239 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549865229111 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4562450277 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.894736842 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5263157895 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84210526316 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0777644098669 0.244688304435 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0306173564583 0.084324248473 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390324584136 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0571538116445 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0103048320034 0.056905535591 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.