Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Not all crimes are same; hence the punishment also should vary according to the severity of the crime committed. Although the current practice is to put all criminals in jail, some believe low-level offenders should be made as volunteers for community services. I agree with the latter, people with no past criminal records and who have done mistakes but at minor level stand another chance to improve their moral behaviour and to relive a normal life.
Firstly, no one is born criminal; few circumstances force people to break the laws of the society. For instance, a young boy would steel a pack of milk from a store just to feed his starving family. Hence few offenses need to be distinguished from the severe ones. They must be used as volunteers for providing services to the society, like the cleaning of roads, planting trees, and working for charity. This will lead to a positive impact on their moral behaviour.
Secondly, if first-time offenders of low-level crime are put together with the other convicts who have performed some severe crime, such as murder, rape, terror attack; they might as well turn out to be brutal offenders later. These criminals might not be accepted by the society once they are out of the prison. Hence to make sure they do not indulge again in such crimes unpaid community services is the best kind of punishment to help them lead a normal life in the future.
To conclude, laws are made to maintain peace and harmony in the society and not to punish people. Distinguishing on the basis of crime level should be done. High-level offense high-level punishment; smaller offense can be given an option to do unpaid service which will serve as a path for improvement and live an ordinary life again.
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful, others disagree. Discuss both the vie 67
- You work for an international company. You have seen an advertisement for a training course which will be useful for your job.Write a letter to your manager.In your letter:Describe the training course you want to doExplain what the company could do to hel 78
- You recently received a letter from a friend asking for advice about whether to go to college or to try to get a job. You think he / she should get a job.Write a letter to this friend. In your letter1. say why he / she would not enjoy going to college2. 73
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Some people think certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 94
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 199, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...store just to feed his starving family. Hence few offenses need to be distinguished f...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 313, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ociety once they are out of the prison. Hence to make sure they do not indulge again ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vement and live an ordinary life again.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 300.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81333333333 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54973636981 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.2627788605 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.142857143 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4285714286 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198724318407 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0656966661382 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483751699964 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117705100732 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266785788634 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.