Some people think that with combined effort on the part of government and society crime can be completely eradicated while others argue that this is completely hypothetical and that crime has always been present in societies even in ancient times Compare

The crime rate is increasing all around the world. The people think the joint contribution of the authorities and people of the society can completely diminish the crime, while other argue that the illegal activities are always there in the society even in the ancient times. I will discuss my viewpoint in the following paragraph
On the one hand, many people believe that crime is committed because of adverse situation of people go through, and it can be easily tackled if law enforcement agencies and public work together. Furthermore, if criminal can be counseled to bring them on right path. They should accept by the society and provided some kind of work. For example, there had been drop in crime rate because the government send criminals to rehabilitation centers which they are provided with occupation. It give chance to live a life. Crime rates can because negligible if authorities and society work together
On the other hand, some people believe that the criminals can never changed their behavior. If they get opportunity and right conditions they could commit crime again. The lawlessness has been happening since humans started living is group. There was no sufficient technology to catch the criminals in ancient times. In contrast, in contemporary world with the advancement in the technology and forensic science criminals can be easily spotted and convinced. And also, criminals identity can be reveled by examining fingerprints and DNA
To conclude, crime rate can be brought down subsequently if law enforcement agencies and people work together by applying latest technology

Votes
Average: 8.4 (2 votes)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 488, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'gives'?
Suggestion: gives
...h they are provided with occupation. It give chance to live a life. Crime rates can ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 114, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'applying the latest'.
Suggestion: applying the latest
...nt agencies and people work together by applying latest technology
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in contrast, kind of, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1352.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 257.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26070038911 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80380368148 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.552529182879 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.1662775003 49.4020404114 144% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339203270183 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109746592754 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111694249317 0.0667982634062 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212513719113 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103379376437 0.056905535591 182% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 78.4519038076 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.