Some people think that environment problems should be solved on a global while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally Discuss both sides and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that environment problems should be solved on a global while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally

Discuss both sides and give your opinion

It is considered by some people that environmental problems should be solved by a global approach while others believe that a nationalistic approach will be more effective. In my opinion, a hybrid of global measures and nationalistic measures should be used: global targets should be set but these targets should be adjusted for the peculiarity of each nation.

On the one hand, since the effects of environmental degradation is felt on a global scale, it makes sense to approach the issues globally by setting uniform standards. For instance the effects of carbon di oxide which leads to global warming is felt by all countries. Global warming has led to modified climates and an increased amount of natural disasters globally. It could be pointed out that all countries do not produce the same amount of carbon di oxides yet all countries suffer from the attendant effects of global warming. So it makes sense to set the same carbon di oxide limit for all countries

On the other hand, setting uniform global limits may not be practicable due to the peculiarities of each country. For example, developed countries like Germany which already has started using cars and manufacturing plants powered by alternative sources of energy already have a low level of carbon di oxide emission as such will find it very easy to comply with a uniform limit. In fact, these countries my even have excess capacity given the limit. While countries like Nigeria which are highly dependent on petrol and diesel in powering its cars and manufacturing plants may find it almost impossible to comply with a uniform limit thus making the limit un-achievable and pointless.

Finally, I believe a hybrid of global and nationalistic measures should be used to address the issues of environmental degradation. For instance, there should be a global limit which is then allocated to different countries based on each countries ‘peculiarities. In addition, countries like Nigeria which have a long way to go to each their ideal target should be persuaded to come up with a medium to long term plan on how it intends to achieve its ideal target. The achievement of this plan would be strictly monitored

In conclusion, environmental problems should be approached with a combination of global scale and nationalistic measures to adjust for the peculiarities of each nation. This will ensure that the measures introduced are achievable and realistic

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-04-23 Osei 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 316, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a low level of carbon di oxide emission as such will find it very easy to comply...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, so, then, thus, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2043.0 1615.20841683 126% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13316582915 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98148478682 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467336683417 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 648.0 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.1699221619 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.2 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46666666667 7.06120827912 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211179180361 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829482684721 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0858447999598 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143118977842 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101233765901 0.056905535591 178% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.