Some people think that giving money as a gift to teenagers is good while others disagree Discuss both views and give your opinion

Essay topics:

Some people think that giving money as a gift to teenagers is good while others disagree. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Presenting a gift to teenagers in the form of money is debatable. It is often argued that money is the best form of gift for teenagers to present while others have an opposite viewpoint. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument in detail and provide evidence as to why the financial gift is beneficial for youngsters.

To commence with, there are certain benefits to present money as a gift to teenagers. The prime benefit is that financial gift would increase the purchasing power of the youngsters which enable them to buy personal gadgets including a laptop. This device helps them to submit online assignments to qualify for graduation degree. A further advantage is that a cash gift will develop their financial planning skills from a very young age. As soon as they get money, they will start planning to spend it where they will decide which product is needed on an urgent basis, can we get the benefits from that product, and does the product are within the budget range, etc. This exercise would help them to become a good financial planner to handle upcoming challenges in personal lives. A final positive to give money as a gift is that most youngsters have a habit to save money. Therefore, if the family would face any financial crises and won’t be able to pay the utility bills, kids would join the hand and pay from their savings account.

On the other hand, people give reasons why a monetary gift is not beneficial for teenagers. It is often claimed that youngsters will not give value to that money because they didn’t experience the hardship which someone has made to earn it. Therefore, they will waste money by spending on kinds of stuff like clubbing, drinking, and gambling activities, as a result, they will be spoiled and out of parent’s control. It has been pointed out that gifts are a reminder for people, so whenever youngsters look at their pair of shoes, they immediately relate that gift to a person who presented them. Therefore, cash gifts cannot take place as people often forget about cash presents.

In conclusion, although people though to avoid cash gift to teenagers, so they won’t get spoiled. I am of the view that cash gift develops financial planning skill of teenagers which help them to buy necessary pieces of stuff including gadgets in accordance to need.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-06 docotrieu86@gmail.com 78 view
2023-02-20 soji_kab@hotmail.com 78 view
2021-11-11 RamInd 85 view
2021-11-11 RamInd 84 view
2021-11-01 mohammed123 56 view
Essays by user sohailahmad :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al gift is beneficial for youngsters. To commence with, there are certain bene...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d and pay from their savings account. On the other hand, people give reasons w...
^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le often forget about cash presents. In conclusion, although people though to...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, therefore, while, as to, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1955.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8875 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56763388161 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.515 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2438177984 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.611111111 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2222222222 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213364735131 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0797141058673 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660558822823 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142637712157 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0479273031186 0.056905535591 84% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.