Nowadays worldwide people are facing problems from increasing traffic and pollution. Some people argue that only government should be held responsible to minimize this problem. But other group of individual says that every person is accountable for it and should do efforts together solve this problem. We will discuss here the benefits and drawback of helding government solely responsible for this.
To start with I would say both the problems are interrelated to each other. With the increased numbers of vehicles these days airborne pollution has also increased. In a recent survey 20000 new motor cars are coming on roads every day. So we can imagine the increased amount of traffic and pollution. Undoubtedly Government has the power to enforce certain laws and rules which can result in positive outcomes for this situation. For example we saw odd even policy introduced in Delhi last year. Though this step was criticized by a lot of people but statistics showed reduced numbers of traffic jams and better quality of air index in Delhi for that period.
However along with government individual efforts in this direction can produce better fruitful results. In that way it would be more effective and productive. People can choose to use public transport like buses and metros for their commute which will significantly reduce the numbers of vehicles. Furthermore, they can also use carpooling to decrease the traffic. People should also follow the traffic guidelines. Abiding the traffic rules as well will help in reducing the numbers of jams on the roads.
In conclusion, the benefits outweighs the drawbacks as it is the duty of the government to have strict measures to control this kind of problems. The said objectives can be achieved by the enforceability of law in a hastily manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 215, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('hastily') instead an adjective, or a noun ('manner') instead of another adjective.
...chieved by the enforceability of law in a hastily manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15306122449 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72260374475 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585034013605 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.374337132 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.7368421053 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4736842105 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.365582208414 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988044221304 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849437842044 0.0667982634062 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217787229171 0.151304729494 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131117521726 0.056905535591 230% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.0946893788 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.