Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters, musicians and poets. However, other people think that this is a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Although, it is sometimes thought that artists including painters, musicians and poets should be provided with special support from the government. While other people believe that investing government resources and funds on these arts is dispensable and wastage of national capital. In my opinion, I consider that the art and culture is the integral part of the society and it should not be overlooked.
On one hand, some people think that promoting and preserving art and therefore providing artists with appropriate funds should be the part of the government policies and I agree. In other words, artists such as painters, musicians etc. require proper assistance in order to cultivate their artistic skills and continue practicing their interests. Additionally, art and culture are the backbone of the society and therefore by giving and helping artists with proper facilities is beneficial for the society as well. For instance, there are several musicians and painters whose masterpiece art is exemplary and have earned global recognition. Furthermore, providing help and support to artists is crucial to maintain and protect the country's heritage that is otherwise diminishing day by day.
On the other hand, it is often believed that it is better to emphasize on basic and essential sectors such as healthcare, education etc. rather than investing government's resources on the artists and their artwork. Another reason why preserving art such as music, poetry and painting is loosing its importance in young generation is more inclined to earn and progress rapidly. Consequently, pursuing certain art requires patience and perseverance which is not everyone's cup of tea.
In conclusion, while people may vary in their opinions, I think that supporting art is indispensable and beneficial for artists and the society as a whole.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2018-06-07 | Harpreet Monga | 77 | view |
- Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry yo replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters musicians and poets However other people think that this is a waste of money Discuss both views and give your opinion 77
- Some people argue that it is not wise for an industry yo replace its experienced but old workers with new and young yet inexperienced individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people think that the government should provide assistance to all kinds of artists including painters, musicians and poets. However, other people think that this is a waste of money. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 10.4138276553 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 287.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42508710801 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92641443883 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540069686411 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.2390844443 49.4020404114 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5 7.06120827912 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.230508648039 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795180460087 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658525389302 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141839919951 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0667467280397 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.