Some people think that governments should knock out old buildings and make way for new buildings.Do you agree or disagree.?
At present time we can use the best materials for building construction. The architects can build whatever they want with a lot of kinds of construction machines. many people think that we should demolish all old buildings and remove them with skyscrapers. other ones find it wrong. I'll try to consider both sides of this question.
The latest construction materials are used with building of new facilities. now we use iron and concrete instead of wood. The tallest buildings in the world are made of steel bulks and special glass. many of newest materials are safer and eco-friendly. I know, a lot of them earlier were more toxic and even explosive earlier and now they are fire-proof and are made of safe components. So, new buildings are more secure, taller, stronger. they have modern or futuristic design and they are well-planned. I think it is a good decision for business-centres or areas with high popularity density.
On the other hand, we have many old buildings looking abandoned or half-shattered. Unfortunately, this picture is typical for my town and my country. Government and most people underrate the real value of these buildings. these ones are not only just houses, they are part of our culture and history. For example, I know one curious street in a neighbour town. You can see there how construction methods and view of beauty have been changed in the course of time. There are buildings of different periods stay one after another.
In my own opinion, we must keep and care for the buildings, because they are our cultural legacy and demolishing them is just a vandalism and a barbarism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-18 | alkonavt96 | 61 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 164, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
... lot of kinds of construction machines. many people think that we should demolish al...
^^^^
Line 1, column 258, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...dings and remove them with skyscrapers. other ones find it wrong. Ill try to consider...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: ILL_I_LL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'I'll'?
Suggestion: I'll
... skyscrapers. other ones find it wrong. Ill try to consider both sides of this ques...
^^^
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o consider both sides of this question. The latest construction materials are us...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 77, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Now
...e used with building of new facilities. now we use iron and concrete instead of woo...
^^^
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Many
... made of steel bulks and special glass. many of newest materials are safer and eco-...
^^^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the newest'.
Suggestion: of the newest
... of steel bulks and special glass. many of newest materials are safer and eco-friendly. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lass. many of newest materials are safer and eco-friendly. I know, a lot of them ...
^^
Line 5, column 442, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: They
...ings are more secure, taller, stronger. they have modern or futuristic design and th...
^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
...rate the real value of these buildings. these ones are not only just houses, they are...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 223, Rule ID: THESE_ONES[1]
Message: This phrase is probably grammatically incorrect. Write 'these' instead.
Suggestion: these
...rate the real value of these buildings. these ones are not only just houses, they are part...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, so, well, for example, i think, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95620437956 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88022805986 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.587591240876 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 416.7 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.3228071684 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.6666666667 106.682146367 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.0476190476 20.7667163134 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.80952380952 7.06120827912 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 11.0 5.01903807615 219% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185437098246 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0510611673269 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516227861009 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107898242592 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353171950733 0.056905535591 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.0946893788 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.6 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.58950901804 93% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.78957915832 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.