It is an undeniable fact that environmental problems have become a primary concern for modern society. It is often argued that government should increase the taxes on petroleum for solving this problem. However, I partially agree with this notion due to several reasons which I will discuss in the following essay.
To commence with, if the government will make fuel costly to purchase for driving automobiles, certainly people will not use their own vehicles. As a result, individuals will commute from public transports to their workplaces, and the government will able to gain great revenue from the public transport sector. Apart from this, fewer cars and bikes on road will reduce the traffic congestion problems, and eventually will improve the quality of air in the atmosphere. Moreover, the exploitation of natural resources such as coal, gas, and petroleum will also decrease among the people. Therefore, the above reasons support the favor of increasing the fuel prices to solve environmental issues.
On the other hand, expensive fuel will bring a negative impact. First and foremost, if the fuel costs will rise up, similarly other goods and services will also increase such as food, clothes, electricity, and many others. Due to this, a middle-class person will be suffered from the necessities of their daily survival. Secondly, it will incline the poverty of the masses within a country. Additionally, although rich people can afford the petrol price for riding in their private vehicles, it is tough for a normal person to afford such assets because they have fulfilled their basic standards of living.
In conclusion, although the high cost of petrol would bring positive development to protect the environment, it will also bring adverse effects, particularly for poor people. Therefore, I believe that authorities should take few leads to tackle this problem in such a way where it should be beneficial for the environment as well as the modern society.
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
- You are planning a short visit to a city where one of your relatives lives Write a letter to your relative In your letter Explain when and how long you will be in town Ask whether you can stay at their home Offer to pay for yourself 73
- A friend has agreed to stay in your apartment and look after it while you are away Write a letter to your friend In your letter give information about your flat provide any important instructions say what he she should do if there are any problems 78
- You recently went to a public event for example an exhibition festival or show that you think your friend would enjoy Write a letter to friend In your letter tell your friend what the event was explain why you think your friend would like the event invite 78
- You recently traveled by plane While you were at the airport a member of staff helped you with a problem and now you would like to show him her your appreciation Write a letter to the manager at the airport In your letter 1 explain what the problem was 2 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, apart from, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11041009464 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65984292808 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561514195584 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 317.0 20.2975951904 1562% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1620.0 106.682146367 1519% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 317.0 20.7667163134 1526% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 164.0 7.06120827912 2323% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 8.67935871743 12% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198868060429 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.198868060429 0.084324248473 236% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127129693668 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0177314976656 0.056905535591 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 161.1 13.0946893788 1230% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -250.28 50.2224549098 -498% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 126.9 11.3001002004 1123% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.84 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 23.74 8.58950901804 276% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 55.0 9.78957915832 562% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 128.8 10.1190380762 1273% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 127.0 10.7795591182 1178% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.