Some people think that prison sentences should not be used to deal with criminals. Education and skill training should be used instead.
To what extent do u agree or disagree.
It is thought by some human beings that offenders should not be sentenced to jail. Instead, they ought to be given knowledge and competence training. In my perspective, I agree with the statement and believe that this is the most prolific for offenders. My inclination is justified with appropriate arguments and suitable examples.
There are multiple reasons to support my argument with the statement that criminals should be imparted ability and educational training rather than sentencing to prison. The first and the most compelling reason is it will aid criminals to get a job. In other words, most of the criminals who commit crime are either poor or unemployed, so training them with vivid skills and knowledge will assist offenders to earn their livelihood. For example, there is a culture in western India to train offenders who have committed minor crimes, which has helped to reduce such crime by 5% and helped around 33% criminals to get a job.
Another argument is that training criminal and not sentencing them to prison will assist offenders to keep away from bad company. To be precise, prison is the home of criminals and if offenders are kept together they will make wrong friends and have a higher probability to re-offend once they are set free. Therefore, imparting offenders with useful abilities and knowledge will cater them to keep away from the wrong people and groups. For example, according to a recent survey by the Southern Police Department, 65% of the offenders did not indulge in crime after been trained at the rehabilitation centre. As a result, training aides not only to keep criminals out of the bad company but also to reduce overall crimes.
However, another side should not be neglected which claims that criminals ought to be sent to prison. It must be admitted that training offenders involve cost and this money can be spent on other crucial aspects such as education and sports.
In conclusion, although there is a consent of monetary aspects in giving knowledge and ability training to offenders, I strongly believe that imparting such training will help the society to reduce overall crimes and aid offenders earn their living.
- In recent years, many small local shops have closed customers travel to large shopping centers or malls to do their shopping.Is this a positive or negative development? 84
- Many sports players advertise sports-related products. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this? 73
- Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 73
- Certain personal qualities cannot be achieved through university studies Do you agree or disagree with this statement 82
- Some people believe that to be successful at sport you need a natural ability and others think that hard work and practice can make you successful. Discuss both views and give your opinion ? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 562, Rule ID: AFTER_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after being'?
Suggestion: after being
... the offenders did not indulge in crime after been trained at the rehabilitation centre. A...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08033240997 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66345470986 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.506925207756 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5677802988 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5625 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.875 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 12.0 3.9879759519 301% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250821614738 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0948867352923 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0856651698569 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153098238534 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0783756324554 0.056905535591 138% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 50.2224549098 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.