Some people think traditional games are better than modern games in helping children develop their abilities To what extent do you agree

Essay topics:

Some people think traditional games are better than modern games in helping
children develop their abilities. To what extent do you agree?

In the contemporary world, it is a common belief that traditional games are better than
modern games in helping children cultivate their abilities. I find this view unconvincing due to
the following reasons.
Modern games actually foster more specific skills that are required in this day and age.
First and foremost, modern games are characterised by electronic devices, which means
the skills to use digital devices adeptly can be trained via playing modern games. It seems to
me that modern technologies have fundamentally changed our life. Therefore, mastering
these technologies is an absolute necessity. The second reason is modern games nurture
team spirit and the ability to cooperate with others. This is true in that being able to
collaborate with others is a key skill in any organisation. The final reason is familiarity with
modern games can probably lead to careers in animation or video-game design because video
games have become a popular industry. It is apparent that mastering this skill increases young
people’s employment opportunities.
I would acknowledge that traditional games such as chess can help youngsters to
develop independent thinking skills. This argument has considerable merit in that
competitive strategies are also significant in this world. Having said this, nevertheless, the
ability to think independently can also be cultivated in other ways such as reading. Based on
this analysis, apparently, modern games provide more benefits for children.
In light of the aforesaid factors, I am convinced that modern games are able to help
young people develop key skills. As a result, priority should be given to modern games
rather than traditional games

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-09-30 Rachana92 66 view
Essays by user Rachana92 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, apparently, first, if, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, such as, as a result

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1464.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54545454545 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96892383257 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.6168467751 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 21.0 4.38176352705 479% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364315867935 0.244688304435 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122590205054 0.084324248473 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114772894507 0.0667982634062 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114306067812 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844813211832 0.056905535591 148% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.61 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.