In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Although, we are witnessing a significant advancement being made in the field of agriculture, numerous people are still deprived of the basic necessity like food. This essay discuses about the causes of scarcity of the food, along with the possible solutions for the same problem.
The primary reason for people being hungry, regardless of the advances in agriculture is the ever growing population. In the last decade, the growth rate of population has increased tremendously. Whereas, the production of food has comparatively not increased at the same scale. It is inhuman to change the duration required for a crop to be grown. In addition, food is wasted by many people on daily basis, which ultimately leads to shortage of food for other people. For instance, restaurants, where food is made in bulk, however, unfortunately not all of it is completely consumed by the customers. The leftover food is then discarded to avoid any problems caused by stale food. Therefore, these are the major causes, why people go hungry.
This situation can totally be changed and each person can have at least one meal a day. Firstly, the wastage of food immediately needs to be reduced. Restaurants ought to cook the food as per the need of the hour and not cook any of it in advance. To illustrate, management needs to be well trained in food management and avoid wastage of food as much as possible. This will save a huge amount of food every single day. Moreover, we need to control the growth of population. The more the population, the more the shortage of food. Some international laws are required to keep a check on the population growth.
In conclusion, population growth and misuse of food are the foremost challenges we face and it will ultimately lead to people starving, but a possible solution could be, to control the growth rate of population along with decreasing the wastage of food.
- Some people say that economic development is necessary to reduce the poverty in the world Others say that economic development Discuss both the side and give your opinion 93
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- WITH GROWING WORLD POPULATION ONE OF THE MOST PRESSING ISSUE IS THAT OF FEEDING SUCH A LARGE NUMBER OF PEOPLE SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS OFFER A VIABLE SOLUTION TO THIS PROBLEM TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE 38
- Some people say that to solve today s global problem every nation should have a good relationship with other nations To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and business to move to regional areas outside the big cities.Do advantages outweigh the disadvantages. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 197, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... population has increased tremendously. Whereas, the production of food has comparative...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, whereas, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91277258567 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83914644145 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520249221184 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.8572417886 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.0 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8947368421 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21052631579 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18353021022 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587238963923 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624848974883 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123465338064 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0704458434516 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.