While the modern agriculture technology has been improved, some parts of people in the world still stay in hungry. There are many reasons to explain this situation and effective measures are supposed to be taken to tackle this problem.
In my opinion, three main factors are responsible for the hungry of poor people nowadays. Firstly, environmental contamination and the increase of people’s activities result in decreasing the land for agriculture. For example, you can hardly see the farmland in the city. Secondly, some farmer with poor education do not understand how to utilize the advanced machines to improve the productivity. Finally, people in poverty could not afford the high costs of these facilities. In addition, the boost of population can result that the production is not able to satisfy people’s needs.
The situation can be definitely improved by taking some necessary steps. I believe that people need to protect the environment to enhance the conditions of soil for farming. Another way to extend the area for plantation is to use effectively the space for people’s living. As for the poor-educated farmers, the government are expected to teach them how to use the advanced facilities to improve the productions. In the international society, international organizations are supposed to give countries in poverty financial aids that can help them benefit from the modern technologies to get people out of the hungry.
In conclusion, the possible reasons resulting in this phenomenon are various, but I’m convinced that if everyone contributes an effort to aid people in hungry, they can get rid of hungry and lead a comfortable and happy lives.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, still, while, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35205992509 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11262770561 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591760299625 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 453.6 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.7765201377 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.071428571 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0714285714 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22188076738 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0712472076566 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0559377969933 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148354905861 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763509623289 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.