Successful sports professionals can earn a great deal more money than people in other
important professions. Some people think this is fully justified while others think it is
unfair.
In the present time, the sport has become a multimillion-dollar industry, and sportsmen earn astronomical salaries. There are some arguments that this is not justified, while others think that they deserve it. In this essay, both arguments will be further discussed, along with my point of view.
On the one hand, professional sports athletes are highly skilled people, and they have been under constant pressure whenever they perform. To illustrate, sportsmen sacrificed their time and mental health in this industry, their privacy is taken, and they have to be under severe pressure from the audience and take the responsibility for the results for their hole lives. For an instant, professional football players, like Mohammed Salah, bring name and fame for their country by winning international championships. Despite that, there is no justification for giving them huge income, especially since their contributions to improving the lives of their fellow people is negligible.
On the other hand, other professions that should have greater earnings for their critical and valued contributions to their society. This can be exemplified by specialization like medicine and education. In other words, doctors put in at least ten years in grueling study and internships; their efforts save lives. In addition, teachers play a vital role in educating children, imparting knowledge, and shaping their character and personality. Yet, the annual salary of them is equivalent to the fees of one match or sports game in India for example.
Having presented the arguments above, I have drowned the conclusion that, despite the meaningful and critical role of other professions, there is a great disparity in the salaries among them and sportsmen’s incomes. I want to reiterate my stance that there is no justification in such an approach, and authorities should eliminate the huge gap in earnings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-24 | Atefeh 1248 | 73 | view |
- The system used for rubbish garbage collection in your local area is not working properly This is causing problems for you and your neighbors 78
- An old friend of yours is coming to visit your city You had planned to meet him at the airport but something has come up and you will not be able to make it there on time Write to your friend In your letter Explain the situation Offer to make alternate ar 73
- You would like to rent a car for a holiday write to the car rental agency 73
- Some people say that now we can see films on our own phones and tablets there is no need to go to cinema others say to be fully enjoyed films need to be seen in cinema Discuss both the views and give opinion 67
- Parents should spend more time with their children helping them with their homework Do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d eliminate the huge gap in earnings.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, at least, for example, in addition, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1605.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4222972973 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07360215753 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597972972973 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 11.0 4.76152304609 231% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4240351382 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.642857143 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1428571429 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35714285714 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160535452141 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0589040702004 0.084324248473 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0661654570343 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100931101315 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560488174201 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.