Technology allows food to be produced in greater quantities and at lower prices Some people believe that this positive development while a this feel that the change is harmful discuss

Essay topics:

Technology allows food to be produced in greater quantities and at lower prices. Some people believe that this positive development, while a this feel that the

change is harmful discuss?

Undoubtedly, mass production is purely possible at reasonable expense due to the technological advancement. However, majority of populace tend to believe that this phenomenon is for the bettrement whereas few individuals vocalize for the deletorious effects. This essay asserts that it is widely attributable to economic flourishment, but the untoward impacts on environment could not be overlooked.

Since, with the evolution of food technology stagnant economies are being pushed to remain in vibrant stage which assist in circulation of money across the geographical boundries therefore, pave the path of growth. Seemingly, batch system manufactures at large scales to cater the surging demands of ever-burgeoning population and ameliorating the standard of living of destitute people by availing consumables at cheap rates. To exemplify, as per the data documented by BBC News stating that Japan has enticed almost 25 biliion dollars as foreign currency last year by exporting excess production of food to other nations. Thus, commendable

results are the real evident to mark support for food technologies in current scenario. Even though achievements through food industries are contributing in empowering the nations economically, visible unpropitous consequencies on the atmosphere are degrading the quality. Root casue behind the menace is the discharge of waste effluents which contains toxic chemicals in surroundings inflicted by corporational activities. Owing to which bar of pollution is exaggerating briskly which has become inevitable. It would be biased to bypass the facts published by UN environment Programme stated that China has the world's largest edible output in bygone year along with the highest air pollution rate. This was the result of neglegance in adopting eco-friendly practices.

To conclude, this emerging trend is going to intensify in upcoming morrow which will certainly bring more prosperity but along with that maintaining the delegacy of environment ought to be the prime obligation of every terrain.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-04-15 somu 89 view
Essays by user somu :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 642, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...food to other nations. Thus, commendable results are the real evident to mark sup...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Results
...to other nations. Thus, commendable results are the real evident to mark support fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 613, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'worlds the largest'.
Suggestion: worlds the largest
...ent Programme stated that China has the worlds largest edible output in bygone year along with...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, therefore, thus, whereas, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75986842105 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19278796611 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 176.041082164 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.677631578947 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0720191384 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.692307692 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3846153846 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.06120827912 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165882603368 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504502286312 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305883824467 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.09302358063 0.151304729494 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303019724554 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 12.4159519038 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.27 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.