Today more and more tourists are visiting places where conditions are
difficult, such as the Sahara desert or the Antarctic.
What are the benefits and disadvantages for tourists who visit such places?
Some people interested to visit adventure places and for others it is passion to explore difficult and tuff places. Nowadays many tourists experienced unrealistic places which is difficult to live because of climate conditions such as the Antarctic or the Sahara Desert. This essay will discuss the merits and demerits for tourists who wish to visit such unique places.
Firstly, there are few daring visitors often try to find a place where it does not have access to common public because it would be the selling point for their documentary movies based on forest, climate, food, wildlife etc. There is a huge demand for these types of films in many private channels and they are ready to pay high fees. Secondly, social media became an irrefutable entertainment medium for last few years. Many young people started publishing videos on daring places in social sites which offers them publicity, good income, fame etc. Overall exploring difficult places gives self-satisfaction and enough money.
On the other hand, however tourists get recognition for their work same time well-known travelers and experts last their life and some critical injured because of visiting prohibited places. Most cases this has happened because of not following proper safety measures and entering prohibited area by the travelers. To prove that, Standford University has done surveys on international and celebrity tourists and the results shows that 60% famous tourists last life and got injured due to violating and entering into unauthorized locations. Tourists should explore places with safety equipment to avoid life threats.
To conclude, tourists has the liberty to visit daring places which offers fame however following certain rules safe them from threats
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-14 | Saeed Najd Ataei | 89 | view |
2019-12-12 | vivekrana | 11 | view |
2019-12-05 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 73 | view |
2019-12-05 | wildhog.tejwani@gmail.com | 84 | view |
2019-12-05 | ChitraSenthil | 89 | view |
- Your local council is considering closing a sports and leisure centre that it runs, in order to save money.Write a letter to the local council. In your lettergive details of how you and your friends or family use the centreexplain why the centre is import 73
- Essay topics: Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in cinema.Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- ou recently attended a meeting at a hotel. When you returned home, you found you had left some important papers at the hotel.Write a letter to the manager of the hotel.Say where you think you left the papers.Explain why they are so importantTell the manag 73
- Social media is becoming increasingly popular amongst all age groups. However, sharing personal information on social media websites does have risks.Do you think that the advantages of social media outweigh the disadvantages? 78
- The system used for rubbish/garbage collection in your local area is not working properly. This is causing problems for you and your neighbours. Write a letter to the local council. In your letter:– Describe how the rubbish collection system is not work 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1484.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39636363636 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58441866475 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1599249883 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.153846154 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1538461538 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.38461538462 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29536210285 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101086348062 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0759593068894 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18443229342 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101203890342 0.056905535591 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.