The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree?
There are different opinions in regard to the question of whether cell phones should be restricted in certain areas and places or not. The debates over this topic seem to consist of two irreconcilable camps. I absolutely agree the idea of banning mobile phones in special places, such as schools, museums and theatres. In this essay the detailed analysis will be provided and final conclusion will be given.
Firstly, cell phones are not luxurious anymore. It is a commodity product and even children at schools use mobiles during breaks. However, the negative effect of this is that pupils stop to communicate each other or make any activity. This brings many issues, for example, rising stress, obesity, loosing interest for learning process. Therefore, cell phones should be banned in schools and very limited at home. It will rise up children’s activity, reduce stress and improve health overall.
Secondly, ringing mobiles disturb a great number of people in such places as museums, theatres and cinemas, because everybody comprehends that atmosphere in these places is essential. If any additional noise happen, it will ruin great emotions during a performance. Therefore, all these spaces have special sign about restrictions of using cell phones. Moreover, some places have an equipment which blocks mobile phone’s signal and prevents any destructive noise from them.
In conclusion, I support the idea of prohibition mobile phones in certain areas. It will improve children’s health if we talk about schools. Another area is public places where an atmosphere is a key factor, therefore cell phones should be restricted as well.
- Some people think that environmental problems are too big for individuals to solve. Others, however, believe that these problems cannot be solved if individuals do not take actions. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 67
- The use of mobile phone is as anti-social as smoking. Since smoking is banned in certain places, using mobile phone should be banned as well. To what extend do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that Young people who commit serious crimes should be punished in the same way as adults. Do you agree or disagree? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
...ere are different opinions in regard to the question of whether cell phones should be restricted in cer...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 327, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to process'
Suggestion: to process
... obesity, loosing interest for learning process. Therefore, cell phones should be banne...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36538461538 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78770281455 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.630769230769 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7303260831 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0588235294 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2941176471 20.7667163134 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.47058823529 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255785639564 0.244688304435 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799297837309 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079499643894 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158993205504 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0477058235035 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.27 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.