Violence in the media promotes violence in society.
To what extent do you agree?
There is a belief that media encourages members of society to act abnormally by broadcasting the acts of atrocity. This essay disagrees with their point of view.
Let us start with the reasons why some social workers claim that the act of cruelty on TV triggers atrocity in reality. The first argument is that it encourages some people to commit the same crime for popularity. Criminals often receive publicity, so some of the news followers want to gain fame by perpetrating a similar crime. Another reason is that violence in mass media may mislead immature minds. Young people may express themselves violently in response to disagreement with other children, when this kind of publication encourages them by immoral pictures. Furthermore, it frequently motives more people carry weapons as protection means. For example, in Kazakhstan, people tend to hold either guns or knives as self-defence, which also increase the possibility of new crimes.
However, some media advocates believe that reported acts of cruelty has positive effects on society for the following reasons. First of all, it makes people aware of criminals. For example, newspapers often show pictures of former sex-offenders with the description their offense in order to notify people of their atrocious behavior as well as never leave their children alone. Secondly, media warns people of the consequences of breaking a law. People are often unaware of possible implications if they decide to assault others, but TV programs about outlaws can deter them from their illegal intention. Finally, broadcasting both violence and subsequent apprehension usually persuades citizens that police officers always protects them from violators. People often blame the police force for their inaction; however, documentaries regarding various crimes with the ultimate arrest may change their prejudice about policemen.
In conclusion, even though sociologists argue that cruelty highlighted on mass media causes brutal conduct in public, I am not only opposed to them, but also I think that such media highlights discourages anti-social actions in community.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | avneet28 | 56 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | lokeshpareek87 | 78 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | being | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
| 2021-10-12 | mohammed123 | 56 | view |
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places. Do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people choose to eat no meat or fish. They believe that this is not only better for their own health but also benefits the world as a whole.Discuss this view and give your own opinion. 84
- Some sports are extremely dangerous but many people still like them very much. Why do people take part in dangerous sports? Give some suggestions on how to deal with these dangers. 78
- Some people think that art is an essential subject for children at school while others think that it is a waste of time.Discuss both sides and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people believe that modern technology encourages more sociable behaviour others say that this leads to lesser sociable behaviour discuss both views with examples and provide your opinion 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 253, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
.... Criminals often receive publicity, so some of the news followers want to gain fame by per...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, well, for example, i think, in conclusion, kind of, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53067484663 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85726440465 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641104294479 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 560.7 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.490785953 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.058823529 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.82352941176 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0714808428588 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0266774394929 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0452291662875 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0457164996276 0.151304729494 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00749189907619 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.