While recruiting a new employee, the employer should pay more attention to their personal qualities, rather than qualifications and experience. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion and include relevant examples.
It is commonly thought that a new employee should be offered a job based on his personal qualities rather than academic achievements. I completely disagree with this belief as I think that person's qualification and experience outweigh his personal qualities. In this essay I will offer supportive statements that are ground of this disagreement.
To begin with, I believe that person's education is a hard-earned asset, it should be given more priority as compared to any other quality. After all, his qualification and experience makes him proficient to achieve tasks and thus benefit the company. In addition, it is the academic achievements and real life experiences that makes the person’s identity. Also, it a matter of fact that a person that holds engineering degree would handle the development projects in a better way than a person having good nature or better personal qualities.
Another reason that compels me to disagree with thought to give more advantage to personal qualities is that, the qualities that we could learn by our own experience could not be gained by any other way. For example, it takes years of experience to become a good leader or a better teamplayer. thus, it is beneficial for the organisation to look for qualification of an interviewer rather than his personal qualities.
As per my opinion, a person could borrow a personal quality, however the academic qualities such as education and experience could not be borrowed by anyone. These educational qualities would benefit the organisation not the personal qualities. hence such qualities should be given more preference over personal qualities.
To sum up, I disagree with giving high priority to personal qualities while selecting a candidate for a job. personal qualities do not make a person productive or competent for job. on the other side educational qualification and work experience offer him the qualities of leadership and team management skills.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-11 | elanglue | 73 | view |
| 2019-10-02 | Kanchan Sagar | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-03 | jakirph365 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-02 | noora.qureshi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Android | 73 | view |
- Although you have never formally studied computing, you have always been interested in computers. You have just read about a computer course that really interests you, but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course.Write a letter to the 78
- Write an inquiry letter to your new employer with a suggestion to hire your close friend or relative. In your letter say– Who is this person?– Why should your employer hire him/her?– Suggest what job he/she should be doing. 89
- Some people think that higher institutions should concentration more on academic subjects such as history and the physical sciences, while others think that they should concentrate more on practical subjects such as car mechanics and cookery, etc.Discuss 89
- Employers sometimes ask people applying for job for personal information such as their hobbies and interests. And whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.Discuss both this views 73
- Some people believe that in order for a hobby to be enjoyable, it needs to be difficult in some way.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...sagree with this belief as I think that persons qualification and experience outweigh h...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 31, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ment. To begin with, I believe that persons education is a hard-earned asset, it sh...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Thus
...e a good leader or a better teamplayer. thus, it is beneficial for the organisation ...
^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Hence
...rganisation not the personal qualities. hence such qualities should be given more pre...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 246, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: hence,
...rganisation not the personal qualities. hence such qualities should be given more pre...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 110, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Personal
... while selecting a candidate for a job. personal qualities do not make a person producti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...person productive or competent for job. on the other side educational qualificatio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, while, after all, for example, i think, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1655.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30448717949 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08063177932 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.496794871795 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2089746299 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4375 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197937999143 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774110190057 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477200094193 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126463849594 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0128607961841 0.056905535591 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.