some people think that it would be better for large companies and industry to move to regional area outside large urban centers. Do you think advantage outweigh disadvantages.
Due to globalization and easy access of resources, industries and large companies, unwantedly became a major part of metropolitan areas. I strongly believe that moving them to regional areas outside cities would be a better decision and would be in favor of everyone in the long run. However there would be some downsides, but the benefits are undoubtedly greater.
As per one of the survey conducted by UK government more than 50% of the population believes that the primary positive impact will be directly on our environment. Certainly industries are the vital source of pollution in urban cities, aforementioned change would dramatically improve the environmental conditions of societies, such as less waste and better air quality.
Secondly it would be beneficial in resolving continuously growing population in downtowns. People who moves from rural areas to urban in search of jobs, start residing there itself which adds to clutter. If these industries are moved outside cities, not only it would cut down the number of migrants but will also create some space to special programs (like more hospitals and schools probably) untouched by government. In addition, this change would offer more job opportunities to countryside residents, and hence in improving nearby areas by bringing the better infrastructure and connectivity.
Undoubtedly there would be a whole lot of group who would rightly point out various downsides. Starting from longer travel time for workers on a daily basis and hence wasting large chunk of the day sitting idle, due to increased distance. However, this problem will offer an opportunity to government to build less time-consuming transportation services with better infrastructures.
Another negative effect would be unemployment of retail shop keepers, who make their livelihood by daily sales. As moving of large companies and industries to outside areas would leave many of the such workers jobless. Having said above it would again provide an opportunity to utilizes those places with library, park or any other amusement buildings for better investment. Hence, it could provide job offers to unemployed people.
In conclusion, it is clear that the ability to mitigate a serious world issue is a major reason why the advantages of moving industries and large companies outside urban areas outweigh the possible moral drawbacks.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-05-20 | harmankaur | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-20 | harmankaur | 61 | view |
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 78
- You have a permanent job and few weeks ago you have started a part time short course You are not satisfied with it and want to change this part time course Write a letter to your professor explaining why you are not satisfied with your present part time c 85
- You have seen an advertisement in the local newspaper about helping to improve the environment Write a letter to the editor and explain Why you are interested in it How you can help When you are available 92
- Some people argue that government should stop supporting the professional sporting events and cultural programs and instead support schools from where students can take up sports and arts. What is your opinion. 84
- A motorway is to be built near your house. As you think that is will destroy areas of natural beauty.Write a letter to the local authorities. In your letter•Express your views•Explain what damage will be caused•Suggest alternative routes 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 285, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...e in favor of everyone in the long run. However there would be some downsides, but the ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 30, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
...ectivity. Undoubtedly there would be a whole lot of group who would rightly point out va...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, as to, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2005.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41891891892 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98793409944 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602702702703 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.559117836 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.941176471 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.58823529412 7.06120827912 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.354470108748 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104709227566 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810217440743 0.0667982634062 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182521489536 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707679076093 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.