In many parts of the world, there is now equality between men and woman professions. Nevertheless, society still exclude males or females from certain professions.
Some would argue that the concept of women and men have different strengths and weaknesses will disappear itself over time. However, in my view, much that can be done to address the problem constructively.
One possible approach would be for society to encourage employers and even the government see that its unfair for both women and men be excluded from certain professions because of their gender. However, measures like this takes time and probably will be difficult to implement.
A more feasible approach would be for society themselves to take the lead by ensuring that their male and female employees will not be discriminated or excluded certain professions based on their gender. This would help to establish gender equality, we live in a modern and free society there is no space for gender discrimination.
To further encourage men and women to do whatever they want, companies could start programmes to identify the weaknesses of each individual and looks for ways to include each in the corporate environment. Evidence of exclusions would create a bad impression with employees. In order to avoid problems, companies might encourage their employees to find ways to give to men and woman courage to do whatever they want.
It is true that the problem of gender exclusion in our society will not be solved quickly. However, that is not a reason to avoid taking some action. Society must encourage change by showing the way starting per positions in our government or public sections.
- Women and men are commonly seen as having different strengths and weaknesses. Is it right to exclude males or females from certain professions because of their gender? 73
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features. 61
- Convenience food will become increasingly prevalent and eventually replace traditional foods and traditional methods of food preparation. To what degree do you agree or disagree? 56
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, nevertheless, so, still, in my view, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13602941176 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81716260956 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555147058824 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 428.4 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.800771573 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7857142857 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261459711688 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0821048835147 0.084324248473 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0939199137923 0.0667982634062 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132712467599 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684754405246 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.