Writing task 2 (an essay)
Today’s typical method of teaching involving direct communication between teachers and students will not exist by 2050. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion and examples.
Well, let me state my opinion before we begin discussing the essay. I strongly agree with this statement. Why? Look around yourself. 4-year university degrees are losing sheen because they’re useless. They’re not only outdated but also do not secure a well-paid job. I’d rather prefer learning a course from experts on Edx or Udemy than study in a class.
The significance reason to support my views that, cost of going to university and learn from teachers directly involved enormous amount of money because along with fees we need to spend on assignment, traveling expenses and maybe accomodation expenses if student is living far from home so it's good to learn the courses through other methods like online course. Microsoft teaches online courses at a low cost. Secondly, the subjects students learn in the university are not job oriented and irrelevant to any industry so instead of wasting resources in college/university student can opt out for vocational courses which give them instant job.
Technological advancements also plays an important role in erasing direct communication between students and teachers. The emergence of latest communication technologies such as Youtube, Team Viewer, WhatsApp, Facebook, and Skype have changed the world around us. Teaching methodologies are no exception to this rule. Direct classroom based teaching has witnessed falling numbers in recent years. Gradually, education is shifting online
Moreover, the another method of teaching like distance learning or online course are easily accessible from home, you just need internet connection.
There is a lot of future benefits of this trend on society, government, families and economy. By adopting this method, we can reduce the burden and they can save huge budget which earlier government used to spend on building infrastructure for schools, colleges and universities. Families can allocate their savings in enjoying better standard of living rather than spending all money on fees. There is a no difference between upper and middle class students because both can enjoy the same facility while learning and this way we can remove social differences.
To conclude, definitely the direct teaching method will not exist by 2050 but this change is beneficial for society, government and families in long run.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-11 | anjalee990 | 66 | view |
| 2017-07-23 | jay.patel.4545 | 95 | view |
- The pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by a bookseller between 1972 and 2012 73
- Writing task 1 a letter You have just moved to a new apartment Write a letter to your friend and say Why did you move Describe your new home Invite him her to your new place 78
- Writing Task 2 (an essay)Nowadays advertisements of toys and fast food mostly focus on children. Some think that eventually it affects both children and their family. Do you agree or disagree? 11
- Nowadays managers and team leaders in different organizations are much younger compared to the past What are the reasons for it Is it a positive or negative development 34
- In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 134, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...en students and teachers. The emergence of latest communication technologies such as Yout...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1975.0 1615.20841683 122% => OK
No of words: 361.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47091412742 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35889894354 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87585860006 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648199445983 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 609.3 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.9437821863 49.4020404114 162% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.947368421 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.10526315789 7.06120827912 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180782709207 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0499908530777 0.084324248473 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420324453046 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0943153725324 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413285837226 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.