ㅇㄴㄴㄴㄴ
Lately, teamwork is considered the most important element that people should possess. Teamwork can be found in various aspects such as sports in which you have to cooperate with your teammates to win the match. I believe that playing sports not only gives players excitement but also teaches us important lessons about life.
To start with, sports require teamwork between players. Sports are played as a team. Therefore, they need to cooperate with their teammates in order to bring good results. Everyone has talents in the specific field, and it functions well when they come to do it in that field. This applies to the sports as well. Without this distribution, it won’t be efficient and difficult to make the best outcome. In sports, it has a position in general and each position has requirements that perfectly fits in.
To make this distribution efficiently, teams need conversation to figure out what positions they fit well. Depending on the information they shared, they are able to come up with the best position and strategies that can function in an optimal way.
Furthermore, it helps to build up consideration and tenacity.Consideration and tenacity are things that people most possess to achieve their goals. In sports, we sometimes have to taste the failures. It is impossible to win every single game that we play because everyone makes mistakes throughout the game. Therefore, it requires tenacity and consideration that can embrace other’s faults. These failures teach us good lessons and it eventually grows our consideration and tenacity. Moreover, the ability to learn from failure are also useful life skills. It helps us to succeed as we grow older and thrive in the challenges we will face in the future.
In conclusion, I believe that playing sports teaches us important lessons about life for the reasons I mentioned above. It teaches about the importance of teamwork and it grows tenacity along with consideration which are important factors that people should possess in order to succeed.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-11 | samexi5985 | view | |
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-19 | Barry Shi | 70 | view |
| 2024-08-19 | Barry Shi | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-19 | Barry Shi | 60 | view |
- If people need to discuss upsetting or controversial problems with others using e mail or text messaging is better than using telephone or voice messaging 70
- A university should focus more on its facilities such as libraries computers or laboratory rather than on hiring famous teachers 70
- some people say people taking risks can be more successful than people who are careful and cautious what is your opinion 60
- 3
- some people think that the important role of university professors is to do research others think the main role of them is to educate students 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 231, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an optimal way" with adverb for "optimal"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...sition and strategies that can function in an optimal way. Furthermore, it helps to build up c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 62, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Consideration
... to build up consideration and tenacity.Consideration and tenacity are things that people mos...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, in general, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 1977.66487455 86% => OK
No of words: 330.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1696969697 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89364586803 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.524837075471 102% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.51792114695 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.1197039115 48.9658058833 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2380952381 100.406767564 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7142857143 20.6045352989 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 5.45110844103 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.236089414692 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.076458572812 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0737576698707 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.150856017488 0% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0645574589148 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 10.9000537634 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.73 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.