Some individuals believe that when we give feedback to our classmates in schools or colleagues in work conditions, we need to give them negative comments first. Since people have the belief that negative feedback can facilitate assignments. Nevertheless, I think I will give positive comments in such circumstances. I will defend my understanding from three aspects.
First and foremost, positive comments can enhance work efficiency. If people receive positive feedback from others, they will be happy and be more willing to do the job. Take my friend, Johnson, for example, he and I both work at a company that is famous for the design of public buildings. We had trouble when we struggled with a difficult proposition for the city airport’s new terminal. When I received his design, I gave him positive and encouraging feedback first with negative answers additionally. He was confident when received my message, and eventually, we finished the design faster than before. In contrast, if I just gave him negative comments firstly, he would be frustrated and upset about the work.
Second, positive comments can lead to easy changes in work or assignments. During the collaboration, if friends put objective and positive messages first, they will work in a better atmosphere. People are instinctively hoping for good messages from each other, and a relatively mild attitude toward feedback can bring such good information. When colleagues get positive feedback, they will reduce the barrier in their minds, and will be less reluctant to revise their work. If we just put negative or critical things in the title of our feedback, the receiver will be unhappy to get an understanding of our advice.
Finally, some people may hold an attitude that criticism can enhance because it can push our colleagues to quickly solve the problem. However, if we just focus on a negative aspect of the question, we will frequently lose our patience, and as a consequence, we will tap into many meaningless conflicts and arguments. Therefore, we need to give the receiver a good impression first, and then elaborate on our discussions or debates.
In conclusion, there is a lot of thinking about how to give advice to our friends or working partners, and the discussion about that always falls into unceasingly talking. In my opinion, we should initially give our friendly and peaceful information, to get the trust and comprehension of our classmates or colleagues, then we can enhance our collaboration and know each other better.
- Nowadays people are more willing to help the people who they don t know For example giving food and clothes to the people who need them than they were in the past 70
- Which one of the following qualities do you think is the most important for determining whether a friendship between two people will last a long time Why They always help each other in a crisis or when something goes wrong They have similar interests and 88
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 73
- Which do you prefer with the same rate of pay an interesting and challenging job with less vacation or a job with more vacation time but less fun 70
- Some people suggest that using a cleaner energy to protect the environment is better but some people say the traditional energy sources such as coal and oil is less expensive what is your suggestion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 162, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d to give them negative comments first. Since people have the belief that negative fe...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, so, then, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 9.8082437276 214% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 43.0788530466 118% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 52.1666666667 84% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2124.0 1977.66487455 107% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18048780488 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01312220354 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 212.727598566 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.50487804878 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 654.3 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 9.59856630824 167% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5975216247 48.9658058833 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.142857143 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5238095238 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09523809524 5.45110844103 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255358370789 0.236089414692 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937891043027 0.076458572812 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0867224088073 0.0737576698707 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16619541852 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0912350176336 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.