3 methods to solve the increase of salinity of the Salton Sea in California
The passage provides 3 solutions to solve the increase of salinity of the Salton Sea in California. However, according to the lecture, the 3 solutions are not realistic.
The first solution might work but may cause major problems. Despite that the method of pumping water from the lake into facilities to get heated and evaporate and eventually turned back into water without salt may actually work, but the deadly chemicals left behind with the salts will be toxic for humans and eventually cause serious health problems near the lake.
The second solution will not work as well. Though bringing ocean water into the lake to decrease the lake's salinity sounds plausible but it will not eventually be used due to lack of resource. The construction includes building pipelines or canals, which the government may not have enough resouces to construct, resulting in this solution to be abandoned.
The third solution is not working for the long-term. The idea of dividing the lake into sections to control salinity is tempting, but geological activities such as earthquake will completely destroy the walls that divide the lake. So when this plan comes into reality, it is only going to last for the long-term but instead for a relatively short time and get completely destroyed when destructive geological activities occur.
- TPO 4 Endotherms 70
- four day week and are willing to accept less payment 70
- Your professor is teaching a class on economics Write a post responding to the professor s question 70
- 3 methods to solve the increase of salinity of the Salton Sea in California 60
- 3 methods to solve the increasing salinity in the salton sea in california 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lakes'' or 'lake's'?
Suggestion: lakes'; lake's
...ean water into the lake to decrease the lakes salinity sounds plausible but it will n...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ution is not working for the long-term. The idea of dividing the lake into sections...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, third, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 15.1003584229 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 6.0 43.0788530466 14% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 52.1666666667 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1116.0 1977.66487455 56% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 216.0 407.700716846 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16666666667 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 4.48103885553 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65739127624 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 212.727598566 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.597222222222 0.524837075471 114% => OK
syllable_count: 345.6 618.680645161 56% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.59856630824 10% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.6003584229 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.7718223732 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.6 100.406767564 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 5.45110844103 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 11.8709677419 34% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136241459182 0.236089414692 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0731449777529 0.076458572812 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.181564085477 0.0737576698707 246% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123702529515 0.150856017488 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170303745875 0.0645574589148 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 11.7677419355 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 58.1214874552 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 86.8835125448 67% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.