Some companies are essential for societies because they provide vital products and services, which are necessary for people. However, in many cases, these companies are damaging the environment in order to generate these goods and services. There are various views to solve this problem, which some of them are awfully unpractical. For instance, some people adhere to the idea that requiring these companies to pay the penalty will be effective, which I entirely disagree with. As far as I am concerned, it will force companies to raise their prices, and there will not be done any constructive affair to save the environment. In the following, I will elucidate my rationale by advancing these two reasons.
The first crucial point to be mentioned is that forcing companies to pay fines will lead them to boost prices. Regrettably, currently, a myriad number of companies and plants are suffering from harsh worldwide economic conditions, so they will increase prices in order to compensate for the higher taxes and large fines. Obviously, the more they get fines, the more they will rise their goods and services prices. My own experience is a compelling evidence of this reality. Two years ago, with one of my friends, we were producing cat foods, and our factory was polluting the air. As a result, the government forced us to pay an enormous amount of money as fines. Then, we had to increase our products' prices in order to pay off the fines. Had we not been forced to pay the fines, we would not have increased the prices.
Second, fines and higher taxes will not be effective to save the environment because the money which is collected from companies that are polluting the environment is not spending on activities to save the environment. Actually, the government does not pay for scientists to establish different solutions to protect the environment. For instance, a recent study undertaken by the University of London demonstrated that almost all of environment-friendly activities are not founding by governments. This evidence evidently indicates that enormous taxes and fines will not be functional to preserve the environment.
In brief, all aforementioned reasons and examples lead us to the conclusion that there are superior ways rather than forcing companies to pay taxes and fines to preserve the environment. This is because higher taxes and fines will cause higher prices, and because the money gained from these taxes and fines will not spend on protecting the environment.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects 65
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families Help from the government is unnecessary 60
- People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community Explain why 1 Plant trees a 70
- 5 Aug Many companies provide important products or services but also damage the environment Some people believe that the best way to stop companies from harming the environment is to require them to pay a penalty such as higher tax or a large fine when 73
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Some companies are essential for societi...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nale by advancing these two reasons. The first crucial point to be mentioned ...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould not have increased the prices. Second, fines and higher taxes will not ...
^^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tional to preserve the environment. In brief, all aforementioned reasons and...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, second, so, then, for instance, in brief, as a result, in many cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 15.1003584229 146% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 409.0 407.700716846 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14180929095 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89831206318 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464547677262 0.524837075471 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 667.8 618.680645161 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5079768132 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.15 100.406767564 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.45 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9 5.45110844103 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259489770393 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764798089147 0.076458572812 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062619271007 0.0737576698707 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16522058727 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319584827367 0.0645574589148 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 10.9000537634 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.