People in communities can make decisions that protect and improve the natural environment Which one of the following three actions is most useful for people to do if they want to help the environment in their local community Explain why 1 Plant trees a

Making different decisions in order to save the natural environment is extremely vital because in recent decades humans have caused innumerable damages to it. Some people adhere to the idea that planting trees and creating parks is the most useful way to protect and promote the natural environment, which I completely agree with it. I believe in this way for two crucial reasons. First, by planting trees there will be more healthy air, and second, it will save many other species. In the following, I will elucidate my rationale by advancing these two reasons.

First of all, If we plant more trees, we will have healthier air to breathe. No one can cast a shadow of doubt on the idea that trees make the air cleaner. Trees are the Earth’s lungs, and they take carbon dioxide and produce oxygen. Therefore, by this means we will have healthy air, which is necessary to protect and improve the natural environment. For instance, a recent study undertaken by the University of London demonstrated that in order to save natural environment in one of our country’s cities, we need cleaner air, which should be fifty percent cleaner than the current air in there, and in order to achieve this goal there should be fifty percent more trees. This evidence indicates that how trees play an important role to save the natural environment.

Moreover, trees and parks are natural habitats of various animal species. Unfortunately, nowadays, humans have destroyed animals homes in different parts of the world. Thus, by planting trees humans will have a chance to correct their mistakes and save natural environment. For example, when I was a kid, we had a natural forest near our home, which was inhabited by different animals, but after several years the forest was destroyed in order to build more houses, so many different species lost their homes. However, last year, we decided to build a big park, we hope different animals will come and live in there. Had we not decided to build the park, we would not have had a chance to build a home for animals.

In brief, all aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that the best way to save natural environment is by planting trees. This is because by this means there will be more cleaner air, and because there will be a chance to save different animal species.

Votes
Average: 7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onale by advancing these two reasons. First of all, If we plant more trees...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...role to save the natural environment. Moreover, trees and parks are natur...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...royed in order to build more houses, so many different species lost their homes. However, last...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a chance to build a home for animals. In brief, all aforementioned reason...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'cleaner' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: cleaner
... is because by this means there will be more cleaner air, and because there will be a chance...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in brief, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 13.8261648746 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1928.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 398.0 407.700716846 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84422110553 4.8611393121 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55860330008 2.67179642975 96% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 212.727598566 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469849246231 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.2672299241 48.9658058833 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.473684211 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9473684211 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94736842105 5.45110844103 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.5376344086 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175335252665 0.236089414692 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611091218047 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516934604948 0.0737576698707 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113011163361 0.150856017488 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526374642764 0.0645574589148 82% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 11.7677419355 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 10.9000537634 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.01818996416 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.