agree or disagree. It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life
It has been debated for years whether we need the internet to live better life or do not. We can not ignore that this invention has changed our lives, and that it has some pros and cons. Personally, I believe that its advantage outweigt its drawbucks and it is impossible for us now to live without an access to the internet. I feel this way for two main reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
First of all, nowadays jobs almost depend on some communication based on sending and receiving e-mails. If you wanted to look for a position or to follow up after a job interview, you need an internet access to send e-mails. Then to discuss an issue with your boss or colleagues, the best way for chatting or distributing any plans is to use this magical network. Also, to work from home or to work during late hours at night, you definitely interested in having modem to get some information from your job website, download documents or upload others. And we should not forget about having connection with coworkers living out your city, state and maybe country. My own experience is a compelling example of the following. My brother is a researcher, so he receives daily more than 50 e-mails. Some of them to fix some points with his workmate, others to communicate with researchers who are living abroad but having common field of experimentation. To be honest, I can not imagine his life with out all of these missions which are impossible to accomplish without living in the era of the internet.
Secondly, this network makes our life easier and saves us time and money in an incredible way. Now you can pay for your rental and bills just when you are sitting on your sofa. You can make an appointment with your doctor, read news and check your bank account from your home. And we do not have to forget about shopping anytime from every where in an unbelievable comfort and ease. For instance, when I was pregnant, I bought all my baby stuff like stroller, car seat and clothes without any need to move and use a public transportation when I am tired.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the internet could be considered one of the most important invention in our century.
- agree or disagree. It is not necessary to have access to the Internet to live a full life 70
- Which do you prefer in your leusire time; go out or spend time indoors? 70
- Do you agree or disagree that parents should not express their disagreement to teachers if parents find the teaching method is not right? 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'access'.
Suggestion: access
...s impossible for us now to live without an access to the internet. I feel this way for tw...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 993, Rule ID: WITH_OUT[1]
Message: This word is usually written together. Did you mean 'without'?
Suggestion: without
...o be honest, I can not imagine his life with out all of these missions which are impossi...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an incredible way" with adverb for "incredible"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...life easier and saves us time and money in an incredible way. Now you can pay for your rental and bi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 335, Rule ID: EVERY_WHERE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'everywhere'?
Suggestion: everywhere
...e to forget about shopping anytime from every where in an unbelievable comfort and ease. Fo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 15.1003584229 73% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 13.8261648746 152% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 43.0788530466 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 52.1666666667 107% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1812.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 391.0 407.700716846 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.63427109974 4.8611393121 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63750205357 2.67179642975 99% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 212.727598566 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570332480818 0.524837075471 109% => OK
syllable_count: 567.0 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8457475326 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3684210526 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5789473684 20.6045352989 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.78947368421 5.45110844103 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145514220497 0.236089414692 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0456482608606 0.076458572812 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0533710617295 0.0737576698707 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0893731337318 0.150856017488 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496514368971 0.0645574589148 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 11.7677419355 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 10.9000537634 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.