With the rapid advancement of modern technology, the pace of daily life has changed dramatically. People nowadays are increasingly busy than ever. As a result, people spend less time with their family and have fewer regularly meals with their beloved ones. However, personally, I don’t think it’s proper to leave out family meals because it can bring us benefits including experience sharing and enhancing relationships.
First of all, family meals provide an opportunity for both parents and children to share their recent experience and learn from each other. During family meals, parents can talk about their work and exchange their insight about social events. Therefore, children can have a better understanding of what’s happening in the real world. In addition to discussing social events, parents are able to cultivate individual views of the children. For example, my mother is used to talk about interesting things she encountered in her work. She has been working as a software engineering for many years. I gained a lot of engineering knowledge from her at a very young age and it even made me plan to be an engineer in the future. It is worthing noting that this process is of bilateral benefits and parents can be the beneficial owner.
Secondly, in addition to sharing experiences of family members, regularly meals also help to promote relationships between the members. There are several factors contributing to this point. First of all, the preparation of family meals requires communication skills. Through the discussion of different members’ tasks, the skill of tactic understanding can be easily cultivated. Secondly, when meals are finished, mutual compliments are likely to remove previous misunderstandings and bring family members closer together. This process is especially important for couples because we all know that passion between lovers tends to decrease as time goes by. Regularly family meals strengthen their bonds and make it possible for couples to communicate and appreciate their love and care for their companion. Therefore, regularly family meals are necessary for people’s life.
Finally, strong evidences suggest that having family meals can improve health conditions. Recent research conducted by National Health Research Center (NHRC) in my country suggests that family meals increase people’s mood. As a result, people become more energetic and healthier. Although it is hard to imagine such a process can results in improvement of health, statistical results have shown that people who have regular family meals reduce 20% the risks of getting chronic diseases such as high blood pressure.
In conclusion, although modern life can be overwhelming and people nowadays have less free time, it is still significantly important to spend time gathering with families on the table because it not only can enhance the family relationship but also warm the heart of each family member. Furthermore, family meals also improve people’s health condition and help to develop a better living.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own than by people whose views are different from yours. 76
- To preserve old historic buildings vs to replace them with new modern buildings 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to know about events happening around the world, even if it is unlikely that they will affect your daily life. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Nowadays it is not important for people to have regularly family meals together 89
- TPO 47 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 334, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
...t is hard to imagine such a process can results in improvement of health, statistical r...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.0286738351 63% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2602.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 474.0 407.700716846 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.48945147679 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.66599839874 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92716938422 2.67179642975 110% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 212.727598566 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550632911392 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 802.8 618.680645161 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2229517204 48.9658058833 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.076923077 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2307692308 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.69230769231 5.45110844103 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369224183329 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989500661558 0.076458572812 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0823886843835 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216019748184 0.150856017488 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0711246753711 0.0645574589148 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.56 10.9000537634 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.01818996416 111% => OK
difficult_words: 131.0 86.8835125448 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.