agree or not? Governments should spend more money on internet access rather than improving public transportation
The main duty of all governments is to increase the welfare of the people, and this can be done by doing different tasks like increasing the quality of public transportation which can result in other benefits for the society. Although some people may states that in today societies the need for internet is as important as having good public transportation vehicles, others mentions that because better public transportation can result in having cleaner environment, it is better for government to spend more money on it. I agree with the second group people and will elaborate on my opinion with the following reasons.
First and foremost, the need for improvement of public transportation is more necessary than having internet access, and more people can benefit from it. Millions of people use public transportation daily in each society, and the big scale of use and high demand on it clearly illustrate the need of investing on them. On the other hand, having access to internet is not a necessity for people, and poor internet access does not create fundamental problems. governments by investing on buses or subways, can help people to spend less time in traffic, and this is while spending money on internet access does not lead to any improvement of life's needs. For instance, I can mention my own country, Iran. Although almost all the people use smart phones and asks for high speed internet, but the government prefer to spent its money on public transportation which has decreased the time people lose in traffics. Big investment on public transportation projects has led to a well-developed network which helps people to go any site of the city in the shortest amount of time and cost. In my view, this decision of government in my country is wisely, and I believe other governments should not spent money on internet access unless they are sure about the quality of their public transportation network.
Second, high quality public transportation lead to better welfare for the whole society, and it makes improvement on it essential. All can easily understand the rule of using public transportation on different kinds of pollution and it makes it clear why all government need spend on money increasing their quality rather than working on other fields like internet access. By providing good and clean public transportation vehicles, government can decrease pollution which lead to lots of diseases. This lead to spending less money on medical cost in long run, and improve the welfare of the people. To illustrate this point, I can mention Iraq. , last year, the government of Iraq announced that they are going to invest on providing high speed internet, and as a result of their limit in budget, they cut some part part of their investment on public transportation. In some months, the air pollution in this country increase and even caused some problem for its adjacent countries. Consequently, they decided to change their plan and put their money on public transportation rather than internet access.
To sum up, people have different needs and having strong access to internet or having good public transportation are two of them. By considering limited budgets each government have, the need of taking wise actions on the way they spend it seems crystal clear. Investing on public transportation helps more people to benefit from it. Moreover, it can have lots of positive consequences like increase in the life quality. Based on these justifications, my conviction is that governments should put more money on public transportation compared to internet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-07 | Ilgar | 88 | view |
| 2018-08-30 | nastaran1992 | 73 | view |
- agree or not? the negative effects of televisions shows and movies on young people are more than their positive effects 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Playing sports can teach people lessons about life.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- the travel to the mars and some probable problems astronauts may face to. 73
- Do you agree whit spending money on space or prefer we spend that money for the earth? 70
- Anting in birds and some possible benefits of it. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Governments
...s does not create fundamental problems. governments by investing on buses or subways, can h...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1189, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
... I believe other governments should not spent money on internet access unless they ar...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 647, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ustrate this point, I can mention Iraq. , last year, the government of Iraq annou...
^
Line 7, column 813, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: part
...of their limit in budget, they cut some part part of their investment on public transport...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, second, so, well, while, for instance, as a result, in my view, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 15.1003584229 79% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 13.8261648746 159% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 43.0788530466 107% => OK
Preposition: 90.0 52.1666666667 173% => OK
Nominalization: 36.0 8.0752688172 446% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3006.0 1977.66487455 152% => OK
No of words: 588.0 407.700716846 144% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11224489796 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.9242980521 4.48103885553 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91811331978 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.408163265306 0.524837075471 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 910.8 618.680645161 147% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 9.59856630824 104% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 1.86738351254 536% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5686016435 48.9658058833 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.25 100.406767564 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.6045352989 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.70833333333 5.45110844103 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.460748857141 0.236089414692 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143902156173 0.076458572812 188% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108673697065 0.0737576698707 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.308140379553 0.150856017488 204% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612960692255 0.0645574589148 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 11.7677419355 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 58.1214874552 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 10.9000537634 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.01818996416 94% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 86.8835125448 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.002688172 185% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.