all university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Knowing past events and the origin of civilization are the most important pillars of each society in today's world. Due to the fact that modern technology makes life easier and brings new issues that people are completely involved them. Thus there is no more time to explore ancient history and know about history. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether all students should take history courses regardless of their field of study or whether they should not. Some people possess the conviction that the former is more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that taking history classes is time-wasting. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. I think it is important for us to have a basic knowledge of history. To substantiate my point of view the following paragraphs represent the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint reason is that each person who lives and takes participates in society should be aware of their origin. When people explore their past it brings them great and valuable lessons. They can learn from the past and their ancestors and prevent repeating their mistakes again. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. I live in a country that has strong roots in the past. Actually, I never fall in love with history courses. I thought they were boarding lessons. But When my friends held a presentation about the last forty years ago, I compared those events with today and found there are positive relationships between them.
The second rationable reason that is rooted behind this opinion is that when we travel to a new country or visitors come to our country we can explain our country's history to them and answer their questions. For example, last summer I traveled to a new country in Europe. The people of that country were kind and I spent pleasing time with them. They were curious about my country and I told them what I had remembered from the history courses that took at university.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons above, I agree with this statement that students should take history courses at university.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The environmental issue is too complex to be handled by the individual 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important problems in today s world will be solved in our lifetime 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you than to choose friends that will help you when you need them 71
- Do you prefer to take a course taught by a professor with whom you have not had classes before or a course taught by a professor whose class you have taken before Give specific examples and details to support your answer 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...at people are completely involved them. Thus there is no more time to explore ancien...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, for example, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98097826087 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62946751664 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9111990374 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2857142857 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223901558433 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545546976943 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839205269006 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142600744014 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057226607418 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 237, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...at people are completely involved them. Thus there is no more time to explore ancien...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, for example, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 11.0286738351 154% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 43.0788530466 135% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1833.0 1977.66487455 93% => OK
No of words: 368.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98097826087 4.8611393121 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62946751664 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538043478261 0.524837075471 103% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 618.680645161 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.9111990374 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.2857142857 100.406767564 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5238095238 20.6045352989 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.47619047619 5.45110844103 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223901558433 0.236089414692 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545546976943 0.076458572812 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0839205269006 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142600744014 0.150856017488 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057226607418 0.0645574589148 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 86.8835125448 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.