Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important to choose friends that can have fun
with you than to choose friends that will help you when
you need them.
Friendship and communication with people are the most important pillars of each society in today’s world. Due to the fact that we live in a chaotic and fast-paced world, it is necessary for us to choose our friends wisely. A good friendship can bring us a pleasant time and has a positive influence on our mental and soul abilities. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether people should choose friends that can have fun with them or whether they should choose friends that will help them when they need. Some people possess the conviction that the former is more agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that the latter is more fruitful. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. While there are many features that we can consider as features that we can use as friendship measurement, the most critical one is reliability and a sense of responsibility. Furthermore, I’d rather continue with the second approach which is to choose a person who will help us when we need it. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that helping people in a hard and tough situation is a basic step of humanity. It helps us to enhance and boost our relationships with our friends and feel better about them. In hard circumstances when there is no hope for our integrity, we can trust our friends’ help and ask them. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. When I was in my middle-twenty, one of my friends helped me to buy a new car. I was in a difficult situation and needed money to afford my life. Thus, I decided to buy a car and work at Uber. But, I was a student and I did not have financial support. She helped me and lent me money. Seven months later, I bought a car and worked hard to pay back her money.
The second rational reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that we can always have fun with people but true friends and close friends are who help us in hard situations. If we recognize these two kinds of definitions, we can choose our friends with awareness and our relationship will be durable for a long time. For example, teenagers have a lot of friends. They spend more time with their classmates that they think are true friends, but after graduation, they will find that some of their friendship just because they saw them every day.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I disagree with this statement that it is more important to choose friends that can have fun with you.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-09 | porteghale Abiasli | 71 | view |
| 2021-11-05 | Maryam_zn | 82 | view |
| 2021-06-01 | m.ramezanii1987@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-16 | soheila123 | 71 | view |
| 2020-04-14 | pouyasoltan | 68 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement One of the characteristics of successful leaders is the sense of responsibility for accepting their mistakes 76
- TPO 64 Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own Use 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If you do not make sure other people especially influential people or your employers know about your strengths and accomplishments you will never get successful in life 70
- Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Agree or disagree 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, while, for example, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 9.8082437276 163% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 13.8261648746 145% => OK
Relative clauses : 22.0 11.0286738351 199% => OK
Pronoun: 80.0 43.0788530466 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2176.0 1977.66487455 110% => OK
No of words: 467.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65952890792 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72929321371 2.67179642975 102% => OK
Unique words: 230.0 212.727598566 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492505353319 0.524837075471 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1727036298 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.6666666667 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4583333333 20.6045352989 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368779497422 0.236089414692 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0905755889715 0.076458572812 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116656359497 0.0737576698707 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278891926448 0.150856017488 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.15392158963 0.0645574589148 238% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 11.7677419355 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 58.1214874552 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.1575268817 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 10.9000537634 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.01818996416 96% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 86.8835125448 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.