How to preserve relationship among people has been an appealing topic. Several people argue that it is crucial for maintaining relationships to always telling the truth. Personally, I agree with this argument.
On one hand, what has been put under consideration is relational conservation. It cannot be denied that only by telling the truth, can people automatically receive the truthfulliness form their friends and families. It is possible for them to build mutual belief. By doing this, they are likely to tell others their secrets without no fear. Consequencely, they stand a good chance of sharing pleasure and get consolation for sadness. For this reason, there is liklihood for them to make their relations stronger. More notably, it is widely known that honesty helps people to be the most respected ones in the society. Alternately, they are able to get good friends and love from others. They, therefore, are bound to receive behaviors from other people. It is capable for them to be fillled with happiness. Withdoubt, this completely helps them to reinforce their relation and treasure each others more.
On the other hand, some might say telling the truth frequently bring the bad news and straight remarks that are prone to cause others upset. Thus, this certainly ruins the relationship. However, it is just applicable for a minority. In fact, being straightforward is the best way to receive adoration form others. Therefore, people are certain to strengthen their relations. Besides, even if giving straightforward comments causes others upset, this disappointment also be considered to be the chance for people to reflect on themselves to find out their weaknesses. This is favorable condition for them to complete their background and become more perfect. As a result, they are likely to be more confident and harvest success in life as well as work. As a fact, they are certain to be thankful to those who giving straight remarks. It is undoubtedly for them to have good relation ship. By and large,
In a word, receiving the truthfulliness from friends and family, being the most respected ones in the society, and get straight remarks are convincing reasons for my agreements. It is highly recommended that people should take my writing into detailed consideration to guidiline an appropriate decisions on how to preserve relationship among people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 164, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... truth, can people automatically receive the truthfulliness form their friends an...
^^
Line 5, column 903, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o have good relation ship. By and large, In a word, receiving the truthfulliness ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'decision'?
Suggestion: decision
...nsideration to guidiline an appropriate decisions on how to preserve relationship among p...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 351, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to preserve relationship among people.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, then, therefore, thus, well, in fact, as a result, as well as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 30.0 15.1003584229 199% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1996.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 383.0 407.700716846 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21148825065 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.42384287591 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97358658993 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 212.727598566 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532637075718 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 599.4 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 17.0 9.59856630824 177% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.5606424296 48.9658058833 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7692307692 100.406767564 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7307692308 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.45110844103 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.5376344086 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124983377187 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358587255139 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562728629141 0.0737576698707 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103055876607 0.150856017488 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522943654199 0.0645574589148 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 11.7677419355 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.35 10.9000537634 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.