Ambitious dreams or realistic dreams
Currently, the whole society has witnessed an unprecedented accumulation of material affluence, thus a bunch of individuals, driven by the enthusiasm of realizing their dreams, are endeavoring to formulate their dreams. However, a myriad of citizens harbor the idea that the youngsters are supposed to dream bigger since merely ambitious dreams can guide or pave their ways to achieve success. Personally speaking, I stand on the opposite side. I suggest that realistic and facile dreams ought to be set and my view can be substantiated as follows.
To start with, realistic dreams are more approachable. To be more specific, it is always burdensome for us to realize ambitious dreams, not to mention achieving such dreams in a modern society saturated with fierce and stiff competition. Therefore, making ambitious dreams probably, on one hand, fails to enable us to make progress in our own lives, on the other hand, it may end up biting us in the downside, which means that we are likely to be burdened with the sense of inferiority. On the contrary, having realistic dreams does not mean we cannot achieve great success in the long run. As the saying goes, a journey of a thousand miles starts with a footstep, that is to say, the accumulation of any little achievement that we have made during the process of realizing our facile dreams can finally constitute the stepping stones of achieving ambitious dreams.
What’s more, it is also more plausible and reasonable to have realistic dreams. Nowadays, there is an increasing number of successful businessmen who become millionaires from scratch, thus inflamed by the mirage erected by the publishing world, numerous city dwellers are wondering they can imitate those millionaires and replicate their success without casting any doubt on the so-called success science and their own capabilities. Nevertheless, provided that achieving great success is that easy, why there are merely one Steven Jobs in America and one Jack Ma in China over decades? To put it bluntly, we ought to make realistic dreams that are under our reach by taking varieties of factors into consideration, such as personal capabilities in different aspects, social networks, the situation of the economy and so on. In addition, the most important thing that we should keep in mind is that having ambitious dreams is not equated with achieving those dreams. Nothing can be carved in stone, but the saying “Every a little makes a mickle” will not change with the period.
Admittedly, having ambitious dreams is not without merit. For instance, ambitious dreams enable us to formulate our future plan in the long run instead of leading a parochial life. Nevertheless, the listed advantage is based on the strong personal ability to predict future development and advancement and majorities of people are not endowed with such ability.
In a nutshell, I would like to reiterate my opinion that the optimal option for us is to have realistic dreams since such dreams are more approachable and facile. In addition, it can also contribute to the fulfillment of ambitious dreams.
- The best way to reduce air pollution is for the government to raise the cost of fuel 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important to read or watch the news presented by people whose views are similar to your own or read or watch the news presented by those whose views are different from your own. 73
- It is better to spend money on traveling than save money for the future 90
- Government has done enough to educate people the importance of a balanced lifestyle and healthy eating habits 3
- Some people prefer to play team sports, while others prefer to play individual sports. Which do you prefer and why. 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, such as, on the contrary, to start with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 9.8082437276 133% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 43.0788530466 100% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 52.1666666667 150% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2611.0 1977.66487455 132% => OK
No of words: 506.0 407.700716846 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16007905138 4.8611393121 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7428307748 4.48103885553 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90850884042 2.67179642975 109% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513833992095 0.524837075471 98% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 618.680645161 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 7.0 3.08781362007 227% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.8317670739 48.9658058833 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.55 100.406767564 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3 20.6045352989 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.45110844103 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 11.8709677419 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401812910964 0.236089414692 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148494674495 0.076458572812 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.123655708412 0.0737576698707 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.273270201552 0.150856017488 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.068688883539 0.0645574589148 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 11.7677419355 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 58.1214874552 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.1575268817 128% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 10.9000537634 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.