Dreams demonstrate to us the overall picture of how we want our lives to be. People always admire those who can realize their dreams, and these people are also considered as lucky ones. When it comes to personal goals, some are afraid of to think boldly because of lacking confidence. However, from my perspective, I think ambitious dreams prepare us to be successful as long as we dissolve the impossible mission into small phases, which finally helps us to achieve what we want in the end.
Being ambitious does not mean you do not have a plan. On the other hand, it just means that you are on your way to figuring out what you really desire to do. Facing a challenge project, you will begin to make plans. You can mold our dreams with logical and analytical thinking. Say you want to be an astronaut? First, you should be a straight-A student in high school and take relevant courses. You then go to college with professional training or a strong research team in this field. Someday you may join the Air Force after finishing your curriculum. In this way, dreaming itself becomes an inspiration to push one to act on every divided step.
Another important reason lies in the fact that being too pragmatic may lead to a mediocre life. We all have some friends around us telling us how different his life would be if he had worked harder when he was younger. In fact, it may be true that such a person was too conservative to leave his comfort zone to chase his dream by ignoring realistic concerns. Carroll Bryant once said, "The only thing standing between you and your dreams is reluctance". I have a friend named Serena who wants to become a singer, and she has learned singing for years and spent numerous nights in a street bar singing for people who can hardly appreciate her great voice before she actually signed her first contract with a record company. Such stories are not rarely seen in daily life.
Dreams may seem vague and unfocused at first, but it is the dreamers' job to make dreams come true with their insightful thoughts and efforts. With open-minds, any success can be expected.
- The claims that the burning mirror would have been impractical and technologically impossible are unconvincing First the Greeks did not need to form a single sheet of copper to make a large burning mirror An experiment has shown that dozens of small indiv 80
- Most people can solve important problems in their lives by themselves or with the help of their families help from the government is often unnecessary Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 93
- None of the three theories presented in the reading passage are very convincing First the stone balls as hunting weapons common Neolithic weapons such as arrowheads and had axes generally show signs of wear so we should expect that if the stone balls had 77
- Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Scientists have long known that scorpions glow blue green when ultraviolet UV light shines on them However experts are unsure of what purpose this fluorescence glow might serve Several ideas have been proposed One hypothesis is that the scorpions glow evo 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 545, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to sing', 'to singe'.
Suggestion: to sing; to singe
...to become a singer, and she has learned singing for years and spent numerous nights in ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, however, if, may, really, so, then, as to, i think, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1747.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 375.0 407.700716846 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.65866666667 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49037257364 2.67179642975 93% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 212.727598566 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64 0.524837075471 122% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.1062614523 48.9658058833 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.1904761905 100.406767564 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.6045352989 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47619047619 5.45110844103 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 11.8709677419 152% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207893358738 0.236089414692 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532235932176 0.076458572812 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522673484309 0.0737576698707 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122162281574 0.150856017488 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0751792328707 0.0645574589148 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 11.7677419355 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 58.1214874552 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 8.01818996416 95% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 86.8835125448 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.