Patience is usually not a good strategy; we should take action now rather than later.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I disagree with the statement that patience is usually not a good strategy. Rapid action taking is indeed vital under some circumstances, but it also runs the risk of causing loss. I believe a good leader makes correct judgement of the situation, and renders wise decisions with time available.
Leaders do need to make quick calls in urgent conditions as ambivalence and
hesitation would cause irreversible damage, and thus should be by all means avoided.
For example, hospitals usually receive the case where a patient is heavily injured in an
accident with multiple organs failing. The chief physician of the hospital needs to
analyze the overall body condition of the patient in a quick yet effective manner, and
lead the team to begin treatment from the most injured part. Under such situation, any
delaying could possibly render some damaged areas untreatable or even cause death.
However, there are medical symptoms unfathomable to the most knowledgeable and
experienced doctors for which they make decisions they might themselves later
disagree upon. This is because given very limited time, they are forced to concentrate
on certain parts and thus may inevitably overlook details that might be crucial enough
to sway their earlier decisions.
While quick decision making ability is regarded as an indication of good judgement
and decisiveness in an emergency, people also associate it with being rash and
impetuous when time is ample. In other words, when the situation is not urgent,
decision makers are more appreciated if they could carefully examine the information
available and actively engage in discussions before reaching an agreement. For
instance, regardless of their political systems, the enactment of a law has never been
an easy journey for any countries. The American congress, British parliament, and
their counterparts all over the world, which are recognized as the political leaders of
the country, have to undergo an arduous legislation process to implement
sophisticated laws that can benefit their citizens.
That said, I believe quick decision making is not always a necessity anywhere; choice
made under impulse can be ineffective or even destructive. Good leaders should
always measure and make use of the time allowed under a particular circumstance to
draw a wise decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-12 | serena_wus | 76 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | serena_wus | 81 | view |
| 2021-01-12 | serena_wus | 76 | view |
- Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 81
- The claims that the burning mirror would have been impractical and technologically impossible are unconvincing First the Greeks did not need to form a single sheet of copper to make a large burning mirror An experiment has shown that dozens of small indiv 80
- 21 Younger school children aged five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math language science and history 78
- Some people say that we should always follow our dreams even if the dreams are very ambitious Others think that we should focus on achieving realistic goals 70
- Some people say that we should always follow our dreams even if the dreams are very ambitious Others think that we should focus on achieving realistic goals 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 10, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'could'.
Suggestion: could
...rt. Under such situation, any delaying could possibly render some damaged areas untreatable o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, may, so, thus, while, for example, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.0286738351 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 43.0788530466 44% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 52.1666666667 73% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.0752688172 248% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1997.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 365.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47123287671 4.8611393121 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83029213594 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619178082192 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 618.680645161 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.86738351254 321% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.1344086022 119% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.0839081421 48.9658058833 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.133333333 100.406767564 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.6045352989 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.26666666667 5.45110844103 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 27.0 4.53405017921 595% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.88709677419 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0737103432302 0.236089414692 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0307084767566 0.076458572812 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432798683507 0.0737576698707 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0144350788039 0.150856017488 10% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296730536938 0.0645574589148 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 11.7677419355 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 58.1214874552 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.1575268817 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 10.9000537634 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.01818996416 124% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 86.8835125448 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.0537634409 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.