Do you agree or disagree with the following statement？
Younger school children（ages five to ten） should be required to study art and music in addition to math, language, science, and history.
Some people think that there’s no need for children to learn art and music as mandatory subjects along with other subjects such as math, history, science, and language. However, in my opinion, I am certainly sure that it is beneficial to have art and music as mandatory subjects.
To begin with, understanding art and music enable children to widen their perspectives. While involving in activities to learn art and music, children can join new experiences that they have not been exposed to. This leads to understand the details about another field, especially history, and learn how to express their feelings. To be specific, art and music all have to do with history. The art and music movements were commonly formed along with world events. For example, after the Second world war, the painters expressed the painfulness of the war and its harsh results through the paintings. Also, the musicians at that time composed the songs with sadness or vulnerability from the war. Therefore, mandatorily learning art and music is a good way for children to pile up background knowledge of historical events and present their emotions in the form of arts.
On top of that, children feel a sociable atmosphere while they are engaged in artistic activities. Artistic activities such as an orchestra or an art performance let children get along with their friends who are participating in the same activity. It allows them to socialize and interact with one another. Think about math or science classes. Children are stationary in the classroom and jog down the notes from the teacher. Even if the science class conducts the lab experiment, this is not requested more communication skills than art or music activities. So to speak, when you are a member of the orchestra, you need to cooperate with others to make beautiful sounds. Also, the situation is the same when you are on the art performance project.
To sum up, I admit it might be fine without art and music as required courses. However, I strongly believe that advantages, when children learn these for requirements, outweigh those when children only learn math, history, science, and language.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-01-11 | serena_wus | 73 | view |
- The truth is we don t know what the main cause of extinction of Steller s sea cow was There are problems with each of the theories that you read about First the sea cows were massive creatures They were up to nine meters long and could weigh over ten tons 90
- Patience is usually not a good strategy we should take action now rather than later Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- 21 Younger school children aged five to ten should be required to study art and music in addition to math language science and history 78
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away thus 78
- The claims that the burning mirror would have been impractical and technologically impossible are unconvincing First the Greeks did not need to form a single sheet of copper to make a large burning mirror An experiment has shown that dozens of small indiv 80
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, second, so, therefore, while, for example, such as, in my opinion, so to speak, to begin with, to sum up, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.0286738351 100% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 43.0788530466 65% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 52.1666666667 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1803.0 1977.66487455 91% => OK
No of words: 356.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06460674157 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77967144629 2.67179642975 104% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553370786517 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.1344086022 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.3409376515 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.15 100.406767564 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.6045352989 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95 5.45110844103 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.88709677419 184% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242960668239 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800380557716 0.076458572812 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507770047661 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151049485768 0.150856017488 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0196077114456 0.0645574589148 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 11.7677419355 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 58.1214874552 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 10.9000537634 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 86.8835125448 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.0537634409 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.