Anyone in this life may makes mistake accidently. but , whether we should correct this mistake when we hear it directly or waiting later. This can be weighed in many aspects. Although some people prefer to correct their teacher or meeting leader mistake right away. Because, they do not want other people to get a wrong information. But, in my opinion, I believe that waiting lesson or meeting finished then I can talk with my teacher or meeting leader to explain to him his fault, instead of talk in front of people. In the following essay. I will elaborate on a couple reasons to explain my point of view.
To begin with, interrupt any person who made accidently mistake in front of others will embarrassed him. In addition, teacher can not continue his lecture perfectly. Instead we can wait until lecture finish, then we can explain to him his fault. For instance, when I was in high school. My math teacher solve problem incorrectly. I directly stood up and said this is wrong answer. She became very shy, and she did not know what to say. after that, I decided to never do that fault again. from my experience, wev can see that we should talk to any one individually, if we want to correct his mistake.
Second, interrupt our teacher or leadership in front of other to correct his fault will decrease trust between the teacher and their students, they will not trust his information more. as a result this will decrease his respect. This will ruin the relationship between them. As I explain in my previous example. after I distract my teacher in classroom. other student did not trust on his information. I recognize that if I wait until the class finished and talk with him. This will give him chance to review the problem and easily give his student correct solution next class.
In conclusion, when I recognize any mistake from anyone. I will choose to talk with him individually. In stead of embarrassed him in front of people. This is based on my pervious expositions which are mentioned above. How this might ruin relationship between students and their teachers and they will no more trust or respect him.
Anyone in this life may makes mistake accidently. but , whether we should correct this mistake when we hear it directly or waiting later. This can be wieghed in many aspects. Although some people prefer to correct their teacher or meeting leader mistake right away. Because, they do not want other people to get a wronge information. But, in my opinion, I believe that waiting lesson or meeting finished then I can talk with my teacher or meeting leader to explain to him his fault, instead of talk infront of people. In the following essay. I will elaborate on a coulpe reasons to explain my point of view.
To begin with, interrupt any person who made accidently mistake infront of others will embaressed him. In addition, teacher can not continue his lecture perfectily. Instead we can wait until lecture finish, then we can explain to him his fault. For instance, when I was in high school. My math teacher solve problem incorrectly. I directly stood up and said this is wrong answer. She became very shy, and she did not know what to say. after that, I decided to never do that fault again. from my experience, wev can see that we should talk to any one individualy, if we want to correct his mistake.
Second, interuppt our teacher or leadership infront of other to correct his fault will decrease trust between the teacher and their students, they will not trust his information more. as a result this will decrease his respect. This will ruin the relationship between them. As I explain in my previous example. after I distruct my teacher in classroom. other student did not trust on his information. I recognize that if I wait until the class finished and talk with him. This will give him chance to review the problem and easily give his student correct solution next class.
In conclusion, when I recognize any mistake from anyone. I will choise to talk with him individully. In stead of emberessed him infront of people. This is based on my pervious expositions which are mentioned above. How this might ruin relationship between students and their teachers and they will no more trust or respect him.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-31 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
- The readind and lecture about the usind of ethanol fuel as alternative to gasoline in united state The writer claims that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in article He mentions ethanol is concidered as 76
- Rules are a paramount thing to requlate or sociaty especialy these which expect young people to follow Whether these rules are strict or not this can be weighed in many aspects Admttily some poeple reject these role and concided them strict for young kids 66
- Many decisions in our life should be taken carefully and is a specifict time this is due to their importance to draw our future correctly A ny delay in takeing any decision may has a negative effect on our life The question is whether in the past our kids 66
- Telling the truth is a very beautiful thing Any type of relationship should be built on honesty For example between parents and children I in this order relationship will continue and become stronger First of all if we do not telling the truth in any situ 70
- The passage and lecture are mainly about the Pluto The author states Pluto can not be concidedrd as planet and elaborates on three reason to prove that The lecturer casts doubt on claim made in the article by refuting each statement First writer mention t 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...this life may makes mistake accidently. but , whether we should correct this mistak...
^^^
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...s life may makes mistake accidently. but , whether we should correct this mistake ...
^^
Line 1, column 267, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r or meeting leader mistake right away. Because, they do not want other people to get a...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e reasons to explain my point of view. To begin with, interrupt any person who ...
^^
Line 2, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Instead,
...an not continue his lecture perfectily. Instead we can wait until lecture finish, then ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 437, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
... shy, and she did not know what to say. after that, I decided to never do that fault ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: From
...I decided to never do that fault again. from my experience, wev can see that we shou...
^^^^
Line 2, column 544, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...nce, wev can see that we should talk to any one individualy, if we want to correct his ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly, if we want to correct his mistake. Second, interuppt our teacher or leaders...
^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: As
...ey will not trust his information more. as a result this will decrease his respect...
^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “as” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ey will not trust his information more. as a result this will decrease his respect...
^^
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ill ruin the relationship between them. As I explain in my previous example. after...
^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...m. As I explain in my previous example. after I distruct my teacher in classroom. oth...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 314, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “after” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m. As I explain in my previous example. after I distruct my teacher in classroom. oth...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 356, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Other
...ter I distruct my teacher in classroom. other student did not trust on his informatio...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 102, Rule ID: IN_STEAD_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Instead of'?
Suggestion: Instead of
...ll choise to talk with him individully. In stead of emberessed him infront of people. This ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, second, so, then, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 15.1003584229 33% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 367.0 407.700716846 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.76566757493 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.48103885553 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54387161349 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 212.727598566 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49863760218 0.524837075471 95% => OK
syllable_count: 530.1 618.680645161 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 9.59856630824 146% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.51792114695 227% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.94265232975 202% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.6003584229 146% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 20.1344086022 60% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2539613054 48.9658058833 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 58.3 100.406767564 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.2333333333 20.6045352989 59% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 16.0 5.5376344086 289% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8709677419 42% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.386491107117 0.236089414692 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102482631824 0.076458572812 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138935675359 0.0737576698707 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262511390799 0.150856017488 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.18625084247 0.0645574589148 289% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.2 11.7677419355 61% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.22 58.1214874552 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 10.1575268817 55% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.5 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.2 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 86.8835125448 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 10.002688172 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.0537634409 68% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 10.247311828 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.