Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past.
Nowadays, the quick changing of the world has gotten lucid for everyone. Regard this fact, there is a controversial question expressing whether these changes make people upset or not. I am afraid, I disagree with the idea which is choosing the lack of happiness for the people of the new era. The reasons to substantiate my idea are explored in the following.
First of all, new changes involve new technology which makes the works of people easier than before. To put on the other hand, the people of the past had to spend a lot of time to do some hard duties which intensify the sense of tired and make the people unsatisfied. Under such a circumstance, they could not be with their family for the sake of the duties of a day and this event is harmful to a person. As an illustration, I am going to speak about my grandfather who used to work in farmland. He had been working there for several years until his wife passed away because of cancer. My grandfather told me “I am so sorry, I could not spend my time with her; I had to work every day for my family”. My grandfather felt sorry neither for not being kind nor for having bad behavior, rather, that was due to do not have enough time because of hard lives in the past.
Second, the changes in the new world have influenced not only the lives but also the relationship. To be specific, making relationships with the help of technology is a wonderful event for new people. It is crystal clear, our grandparents could make relationships with the people of their zone or their city, but people in these years have the opportunity to know everyone all over the world. A personal experience of mine can drive this fact home. My father has worked for a great company for four years, 4 years ago, while he was preparing to quit his job because of financial issue, he got familiar with LinkedIn; therefore, he put his resume on his page and after one week he could find a better job in china. If my father had lived in the past, he would not an opportunity to find a better job in another county.
By and large, I do believe the change in the new world is a great event for new people. Since these changes let them have an easier life than before and spending more time with their family. Also, it has considerable effects on having a relationship with people all over the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | mashghanbar | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | mazenghonem | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-03 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bonjourkmm | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | SSN775 | 76 | view |
- Life today is easier and more comfortable than it was when your grandparents were children. 70
- Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 70
- "Most homes in the northeastern United States, where winters are typically cold, have traditionally used oil as their major fuel for heating. Last heating season that region experienced 90 days with below-normal temperatures, and climate forecasters predi 69
- It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. 66
- Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, by and large, first of all, i am afraid, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 9.8082437276 61% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 13.8261648746 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 44.0 43.0788530466 102% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 52.1666666667 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 1977.66487455 97% => OK
No of words: 431.0 407.700716846 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44315545244 4.8611393121 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54388223495 2.67179642975 95% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 212.727598566 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503480278422 0.524837075471 96% => OK
syllable_count: 605.7 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 19.0 9.59856630824 198% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5323836979 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.75 100.406767564 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.55 20.6045352989 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.45110844103 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.85842293907 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2294439078 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0768771460182 0.076458572812 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0550396931539 0.0737576698707 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162470431796 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0172132605385 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 11.7677419355 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 58.1214874552 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.47 10.9000537634 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.