Nowadays, with increasing world complexity, many individuals believe that they are less satisfied than their ancestors. I, personally, both agree and disagree with this viewpoint because of several conspicuous reasons which will be elaborated as follows.
On the one hand, People in the past used to spend more time with their families. They not only used to work with each other, but also prefer to live together as a big family. However, today with these rapid changes in lifestyle, the rate of big families has drastically mitigated, which means people prefer not to be even with their families. This condition makes a lot of problems for individuals, due to the fact that they obligate to solve their problems in solitude rather than giving some valuable support from their acquaintances; consequently, the dissatisfaction rate of societies will enhance. Therefore, I believe that these changes have a negative effect on individuals’ emotions.
Additionally, although I accept the fact that people had to work harder in the past, the time occupation for working was less than now, for its complexity. It is crystal clear that job competition has noticeably increased during the last decades, for rapid changes in technology. Therefore, people are in more pressure and stressful situation than before. They believe that they can easily lose their job position unless they are perfect and professional in their career. Therefore, I admit this idea that individuals’ happiness has decreased considerably.
On the other hand, technology promotion has a remarkable influence on people’s lifestyle. According to Google, the rate of disease and dead has declined as approximately only 2% of pregnant women die. This rate was much more in the past. Moreover, several instruments, such as cars, refrigerators, have invested, which enhance people convenient.
All in all, I totally agree with the statement and support my opinion in the previous paragraphs. As can be seen, individuals used to spend more leisure time with less work dissatisfaction rate than now. Therefore, there were much happier, for they did not have to adapt their selves with the world rapid changes.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Sometimes people think nowadays the media (TV, newspaper, Internet) are less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problem to the public. 70
- Some people think that we should keep away from others to improve our relationship, because being away from people reminds us of how important they are. Others think we should always stay with others to have good relationship because we can communicate wi 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Leadership comes naturally; one cannot learn to be a leader. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- For success in a future job, the ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past. 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted, which enhance people convenient. All in all, I totally agree with the sta...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 43.0788530466 81% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1855.0 1977.66487455 94% => OK
No of words: 344.0 407.700716846 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39244186047 4.8611393121 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30665032142 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06734262715 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549418604651 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 576.0 618.680645161 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.2172300682 48.9658058833 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.6315789474 100.406767564 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1052631579 20.6045352989 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315528900465 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0889450287014 0.076458572812 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598338451985 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.175390578688 0.150856017488 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0517872318907 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 10.9000537634 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.01818996416 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.