In the contemporary era, a large volume of money spends on investigative projects such as space exploration. Some assert that there are more essential problems in the society which could be solved by this money. Although there are various drawbacks in these projects, admittedly, I believe that the benefits are by no means negligible.
To begin with, the most rational justification is that, with all the problems on the earth, spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. Simply put, the government should assign these projects budget to meet basic human needs. A good illustration is numerous people in the world suffer from a lack of primary living necessities such as adequate health services, institutions, and even food and housing. The large scale researches show that every year, many children die out owing to improper housing and shortage of food.
However, the benefits could not be ignored. The most axiomatic argument is that the only option in the future to deal with the crisis of overpopulation is living on other planets. To put it differently, these explorations allowing scientists to know whether life exists anywhere else in the solar system or not. Discovered information has substantial effects on future life in critical situations. Take the earth with depleting natural resources and uninhabitable places for a massive population. This in turn will force the next generation to leave the earth and live in a new more desirable habitation.
To sum up, considering the points discussed above, the most rational conclusion to be drawn is that space exploration is both rewarding and problematic. From my point of view, considering the disasters which threaten the earth, discovering other planets' living conditions could be significant one day.
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- SOME PEOPLE SAY THAT THE BEST WAY TO IMPROVE PUBLIC HEALTH IS BY INCREASING THE NUMBER OF SPORTS FACILITIES OTHERS HOWEVER SAY THAT THIS WOULD HAVE LITTLE EFFECT ON PUBLIC HEALTH AND THAT OTHER MEASURES ARE REQUIRED DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OWN 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
- Some people think that old people need to live in special communities but others believe they should live with their family and adult children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- Some people say that it is possible to tell a lot about a person s culture and character from their choice of clothes Do you agree or disagree 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, such as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 43.0788530466 32% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 52.1666666667 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1977.66487455 76% => OK
No of words: 284.0 407.700716846 70% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28521126761 4.8611393121 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.48103885553 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97065217592 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 212.727598566 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637323943662 0.524837075471 121% => OK
syllable_count: 471.6 618.680645161 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.1344086022 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7445358378 48.9658058833 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.066666667 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.6045352989 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.45110844103 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88709677419 20% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18753773422 0.236089414692 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0547674426504 0.076458572812 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0508656681526 0.0737576698707 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108964387258 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0359265617193 0.0645574589148 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 58.1214874552 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.1575268817 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.01818996416 117% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 86.8835125448 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.002688172 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.0537634409 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.