A company wants to train its employees to use new techniques. Which is the best way to train the workers?
Have all of them attend a training program together
Have some of the employees attend the program and later show their coworkers what they learned
Employee training is quite important to a company, because the quality of employees is a crucial element and could determine the company prestige. In my opinion, I think the best way to train the workers to use new techniques is having all of them attend a training program together. There are two reasons which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, having all employees learn the new techniques all together could be more efficient. The boss just needs to teach the skills for one time and all of the employees could learn how to operate the new techniques. If the boss just teaches a portion of employees and later they show their coworkers what they learned would take longer time for all of the employees to learn the skills.
Take myself experience as an example. Five years ago, I just graduated from college and got my first job. At the first day of the work, my boss taught all of the new employees how to use the machine which was needed for the jobs. After listen to the instructions from my boss, all of the new employees including me started to work immediately. It just took about one hour of the training program and all of the employees could know all of the skills.
Secondly, employees learn all together could decrease the errors, because if a part of employees need to teach another part of employees than it might have a chance that the employees have a misinterpretation of the skills. For example, my brother who is a senior high student has an assignment about the group work. My brother’s partners are lazy students, so they often absent in class and hanging out with friends. The teacher said about the requirements of the group assignment in class, but only my brother attended that classes in his group. Therefore, he interpret the teacher’s requirements to his partners which didn’t show up in that classes. However, he misunderstood the teacher meaning and all of the works of their assignment didn’t meet the requirement of teacher. At last, they definitely failed on that subject.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that when a company needs to teach their employees about the new techniques, they should have all of them to attend a training program rather than ask some of their employees to teach others. Because having all of them could be more efficient and decrease the errors through delivering the information.
- According to a recent report by our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actual 55
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement In my country young people have a better life today than their parents enjoyed when they were young Use reasons and examples to support your answer 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Humans have long been fascinated by elephants the largest land animal in the modern world Social animals that live in herds elephants are native to both Africa and Asia Their large ears long trunk and long life span have made elephants one of the most cap 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People communicate with each other less than in the past because of the popularity of television Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ds to teach the skills for one time and all of the employees could learn how to operate th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...they learned would take longer time for all of the employees to learn the skills. Take my...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e first day of the work, my boss taught all of the new employees how to use the machine wh...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 277, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...isten to the instructions from my boss, all of the new employees including me started to w...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 400, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ut one hour of the training program and all of the employees could know all of the skills....
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ram and all of the employees could know all of the skills. Secondly, employees learn a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 564, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'interprets'.
Suggestion: interprets
...hat classes in his group. Therefore, he interpret the teacher’s requirements to his partn...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 705, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...e misunderstood the teacher meaning and all of the works of their assignment didn’t meet t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 13.8261648746 65% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 410.0 407.700716846 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82926829268 4.8611393121 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49982852243 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69221120824 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 212.727598566 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.470731707317 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 567.9 618.680645161 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.51630824373 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.59856630824 115% => OK
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4315032442 48.9658058833 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 100.406767564 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 20.6045352989 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15 5.45110844103 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.462296062736 0.236089414692 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131970353917 0.076458572812 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138249230667 0.0737576698707 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291673661957 0.150856017488 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119477612172 0.0645574589148 185% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 58.1214874552 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.1575268817 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 10.9000537634 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.