Compare and contrast your way of your life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying for the next generations?
Our lives are totally different from our parents’ lives. This is due to so many changes that have occurred during the recent decades. Whether our life style or our parents’ way of life would be more satisfying for the next generation has aroused a great deal of controversy. To answer this question we should compare the way of our lives with that of our parents.
To begin with, my generation is used to a life with higher pace. This is because of the technological advancements emerged in the period we live in. Previously, our parents had to wait for everything to happen. For example, my mother went to Australia twenty years ago. When she missed her parents, she had to write letters and mail them. Sometimes it took the letter months to be delivered. However, today, we can call each other using cellphones and send emails via the internet. It takes our messages only a few seconds to be sent. Therefore, we are used to the high speed of life, however, our parents had to be patient. The next generation is probably the same as us. This is because they will be surrounded by even more technological inventions, which make their lives easier. They might do works as fast as a blink. So, they would not even think about our parents’ way of life.
Furthermore, my generation is more likely to step out of our comfort zone and try new things. This is because we are more open to the world than our parents were. Again, because of the opportunities created by technology, people have the chance to learn about the things happening all over the world and they will be familiar with different ways of life. However, our parents did not have access to social media and the internet; thus, they could not think of any lifestyle other than their own way of life. They stuck to the customs and traditions and followed their ancestors. Unlike our parents’ generation, our generation is ready to think and live differently. In other words, we want to get rid of what we are told to do and choose what we want to do on our own. For instance, women were not allowed to work in society about thirty years ago. However, today women participate in the affairs of society. Not only do they have careers but also women occupy so many vital positions. The next generation perhaps chooses to live like us. This is because our generation is not going to limit our children. We are going to foster creative kids who think out of the box and look at the world in their own way. Thus, they would not admit their grandparents’ restrictions.
Overall, I strongly believe that the next generation will find our lifestyle more appealing than that of our grandparents. This is because the situation in which our children and we live is completely different from the condition of our grandparents’ lives.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? For success in a future job, ability to relate well to people is more important than studying hard in school. 70
- The reading passage provides three methods to reduce the salinity of the Salton Sea. However, the professor claims that the ways stated in the passage are not realistic or practical and refutes each of them using the following points.First, she argues tha 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state-sponsored Olympic teams. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how they respond to the specific concerns presented in the reading passage. 3
- Compare and contrast your way of your life with that of your parents. Which way of life do you think would be more satisfying for the next generations? 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, second, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 68.0 43.0788530466 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 52.1666666667 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.0752688172 149% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2321.0 1977.66487455 117% => OK
No of words: 493.0 407.700716846 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70791075051 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71206996034 4.48103885553 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74587498206 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 212.727598566 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480730223124 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 727.2 618.680645161 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 26.0 9.59856630824 271% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 3.08781362007 65% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 33.0 20.6003584229 160% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.3906944472 48.9658058833 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.3333333333 100.406767564 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9393939394 20.6045352989 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.87878787879 5.45110844103 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 20.0 4.88709677419 409% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212008988732 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612771670439 0.076458572812 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653473340125 0.0737576698707 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152974569325 0.150856017488 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585408328121 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.2 11.7677419355 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 58.1214874552 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.1575268817 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.45 10.9000537634 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.01818996416 90% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.