Computer technology or basic needs
Rapid changes and complexity of today’s world represent new challenges ad put new demands on the societies. Therefore, remarkable progress in computer industry becomes one of the primary requisitions for each community so that a plethora of people is in the conviction that governments should pay more money to improve the computer technologies. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that a large number of people get stuck in their basic and essential needs; so answering their fundamental requirements may be counted as a top priority for their governors. I am of the opinion that each of the mentioned view has their own merits and drawbacks, and the following explanation will further elaborate on this perspective.
First and foremost, undoubtedly, the continuously development in advanced computer technology opens up multitude opportunities for human. Humankind has achieved to incredible breakthrough in diverse sciences, thanks to readily availability to wide range of information, and computer knowledge plays a critical role in this regard. For instance, medical science has a great accomplishment in eradicating the fatal disease which cause longevity increases significantly. Besides, education system has improved as students as well as the teachers have easy access to the computers that allows them to increase public awareness. Consequently, societies grow well-informed and knowledgeable people who will be very useful and efficient in the future.
Another crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is that food, shelter, clear water and education are the radical right for each individual, and a growing segment of people is still dealing with acquiring these absolute necessities. Admittedly, no one can overlook the miserable circumstance that some undeveloped countries encounter. When people in South Africa must go miles away from their residency to get the water, or a large crowd has deprived of attending in standard; they cannot think about high-tech devices that may assist them to improve their life. They are hungry and, witness of dying their siblings who suffer from various diseases due to lack of hygiene. In this situation, all the life is summarized in being alive, and the luxury words lose their meaning.
On the basis of the points mentioned above I am convinced that this topic is a very controversial debate since it entirely depends on the place and the condition that people live. Subsequently, most of the obvious need of a person in specific part of the world may seem the most unreachable matter for someone else in different corner.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-12-10 | jimHsu | 60 | view |
| 2021-10-07 | Wei Huan Chueh | 93 | view |
| 2021-08-06 | nida fatima | 88 | view |
| 2021-08-01 | ursula | 66 | view |
| 2021-01-27 | Dyor | 76 | view |
- TPO 28- integrated writing - Peary's trip to the North Pole 80
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both views and give 89
- TPO 32 90
- Integrated 31: The evidences which approved Sinasauropteryx was feathered dianosaure 86
- Has the ease of the cooking improved life? 75
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'challenges'' or 'challenge's'?
Suggestion: challenges'; challenge's
...ity of today's world represent new challenges ad put new demands on the societies. Th...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 416, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... belief, there are those who argue that a large number of people get stuck in their basic and ess...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'well', 'for instance', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.251655629139 0.229887763892 109% => OK
Verbs: 0.139072847682 0.158761421928 88% => OK
Adjectives: 0.112582781457 0.0866891130778 130% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0485651214128 0.046263068375 105% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0331125827815 0.0685040099705 48% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12582781457 0.118717715034 106% => OK
Participles: 0.037527593819 0.0351676179071 107% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.04677863245 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0220750551876 0.0309702414327 71% => OK
Particles: 0.00220750551876 0.00188951952338 117% => OK
Determiners: 0.101545253863 0.0887237588012 114% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0220750551876 0.0209618222197 105% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0176600441501 0.0139019557991 127% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2624.0 2387.08602151 110% => OK
No of words: 411.0 408.028673835 101% => OK
Chars per words: 6.38442822384 5.86048508987 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.48200974243 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.396593673966 0.338922669872 117% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.323600973236 0.251872472559 128% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.248175182482 0.174417080927 142% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.182481751825 0.112833075102 162% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04677863245 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 257.0 212.727598566 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625304136253 0.524397521467 119% => OK
Word variations: 80.122088609 59.2087087015 135% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 25.6875 20.5533526081 125% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.1000254582 48.84282405 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 164.0 120.699889404 136% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6875 20.5533526081 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.644075263715 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 58.0475973236 45.7405998639 127% => OK
Elegance: 1.88 1.45489161554 129% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0575113889814 0.300154397459 19% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0757471618654 0.103427244359 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0416291134054 0.0752933317313 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.508435715361 0.497263757937 102% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.126101274517 0.151897553556 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0218625022958 0.114077575197 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371859315481 0.0781384742642 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.334921657377 0.336927656856 99% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0199824983893 0.067059652881 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0349155894996 0.210909579961 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279910673139 0.0618886996521 45% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8870967742 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.86379928315 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.91756272401 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 12.0 13.6433691756 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.