Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours. Moreover, they feel very strongly about these opinions.
Do you think this is a good idea? Use reasons and examples to support your answer.
It is no secret that in the 21st-century cooperation is a significant part of today societies and no one can deny the direct and indirect effect of this matter on human beings’ lives. From home’s chores to working on a project in the work environment, all these containing cooperation. The controversial question arises regarding this issue is whether working with the colleague who has entirely different opinions is a good idea especially when it is a request from an authority like a supervisor. I personally think this situation as a useful one. I am of this opinion because of two main reasons that I will elaborate on in the following paragraphs.
The first reason coming to my mind to substantiate my standpoint is that working with someone who has converse ideas than mine leads me to come up with new ideas. although at first, it might be challenging, since he would not let me conduct my opinion despite the fact that they were right and priceless, in this way I will be informed of different solutions that he suggests and is impossible to reach through my regular way of thinking. For instance, years ago I was hired in a pioneer company in my major field. At first, everything was consistent with my expectations, but it does not last a long time until I found that my co-worker who has a common project is impenetrable to my ideas. It was hard for me to handle the situation to not be irritated when he was overlooking my ideas. Additionally, it was a valuable company and I did not want to give it up. From when I tried to overcome my negative emotions about him and try to listen to him, his opinions opened a window to considering the new aspects of the problems. Had I gave up those company or tried to change my place in the company against the idea of manager, now I would not have this unique perspective toward my field.
The second reason has worth to be mentioned is that cooperation with unreceptive colleagues makes us both patient and a good listener. Being in the hard conditions in which there is no other alternative, causes the individual to tolerate it for not losing the more valuable things, like a good job or the attention of a supervisor, what was important to me. Therefore, these all make us being more patient, also to listen better and avoid debates. As I said above, I tried to manage the interaction between myself and my colleague and eventually our project worked out well. Since then now I am working in the other section of the company, so I have other co-workers and our communication is satisfactory. They respect me a lot and surprisingly consider me as a patient person who pays a lot of attention to listen to them. I believe that my new manner is the revolution that has occurred gradually inside me after two years of working with a firm-idea colleague.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons lead us to the conclusion that being in a tough situation like working with someone who is not open to the new ideas have myriad of advantages. Although there might be some pressures in beginning, it will conduct us to have better qualities including more patient, a better listener, and also whose horizon in the work area has enhanced.
- Which one of the following values is the most important to share with a young child (5-10 years old)?1. being helpful2. being honest3. being well organized 81
- TPO-45 60
- Consider a situation where you are asked by your supervisor to work with one of your co-workers on a project. This co-worker has opinions that are very different than yours. Moreover, they feel very strongly about these opinions. Do you think this is a 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Because the world is changing so quickly, people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? When people spend a lot of time watching sports on television or following their favorite team, does it have negative effects on their lives? 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 163, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Although
...ine leads me to come up with new ideas. although at first, it might be challenging, sinc...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1033, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[4]
Message: Possible agreement error – use past participle here: 'given'.
Suggestion: given
... the new aspects of the problems. Had I gave up those company or tried to change my ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1041, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this company' or 'those companies'?
Suggestion: this company; those companies
... aspects of the problems. Had I gave up those company or tried to change my place in the comp...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, regarding, second, so, then, therefore, well, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 15.1003584229 185% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 9.8082437276 82% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.0286738351 181% => OK
Pronoun: 82.0 43.0788530466 190% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 52.1666666667 169% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2640.0 1977.66487455 133% => OK
No of words: 568.0 407.700716846 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.64788732394 4.8611393121 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88187981987 4.48103885553 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88446268397 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 273.0 212.727598566 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480633802817 0.524837075471 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 855.0 618.680645161 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.94265232975 162% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6003584229 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.1344086022 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.260924558 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.0 100.406767564 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8181818182 20.6045352989 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.45110844103 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 11.8709677419 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88709677419 143% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163633250539 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529606798064 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0439547325 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104609900108 0.150856017488 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559527478724 0.0645574589148 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 11.7677419355 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 58.1214874552 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 10.9000537634 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.01818996416 102% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 86.8835125448 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.0537634409 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.