Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped and taught separately.
Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and explanations.
Various students have a different kind of impacts on their classmates during a lecture. Negative behavior has its own possible influences on the other students. There are those who say that grouping the bad behavior students and teaching them may benefit the remaining students in the class however others believe that this kind of teaching must not be encouraged at all. Framing my perspective I disagree with the statement that teaching the bad behavior students in a secluded way. I can flourish my opinion in the following paragraphs.
Generally speaking, disobedience may bring some misbehavior in the class yet it does not affect the whole class sometimes because the teacher punishes the misbehaving student initially as a result remaining students get alerted and understands that improper behavior may anger the teacher. Take for example, when a lecture is going on if a student slaps the fellow student and misbehaves with the other student, immediately the teacher makes the bad attitude student to stand out of the class as a punishment. As a result, no other student would disturb any other student in the class. so it is better to punish the child who is indecent in the class rather than just grouping those and teaching them separately.
Furthermore, if the teacher encourages the bad behavior students to learn together then it literally affects the students' future behavior in some way. let's take for instance if a teacher made all the negative behavior students sit in a class, if a student disturbs the class then the other student also assists him in making noisy things. so eventually, there will be no scope for a student to learn good behavior which perhaps affects his/her adulthood academics. consequently one cannot be a good student holistically.
Therefore through all the opinions put forth above, I would like to conclude that grouping all misbehaving students and teaching them is really a bad idea to think about. I do not feel that it really benefits the indecent students.
- Nowadays it is easier to maintain good health than in the past 76
- Nowadays technology is increasingly being used to monitor what people are saying and doing( for ex cell phone tracking and security cameras). In many cases, the people being monitored are unaware that this is happening. Do you think the advantages of this 83
- Childhood is the happiest time of person's life. 89
- Disruptive school students have a negative influence on others. Students who are noisy and disobedient should be grouped and taught separately.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons and explanations. 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting museum is the best way to learn about a country. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a secluded way" with adverb for "secluded"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...that teaching the bad behavior students in a secluded way. I can flourish my opinion in the follo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'sometimes' is usually put before the verb 'class'.
Suggestion: sometimes class
... class yet it does not affect the whole class sometimes because the teacher punishes the misbeh...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 586, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...disturb any other student in the class. so it is better to punish the child who is...
^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lets
...e students future behavior in some way. lets take for instance if a teacher made all...
^^^^
Line 3, column 151, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...e students future behavior in some way. lets take for instance if a teacher made all...
^^^^
Line 3, column 339, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...lso assists him in making noisy things. so eventually, there will be no scope for ...
^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Consequently
...ps affects his/her adulthood academics. consequently one cannot be a good student holistical...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 465, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: consequently,
...ps affects his/her adulthood academics. consequently one cannot be a good student holistical...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...annot be a good student holistically. Therefore through all the opinions put forth abov...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 43.0788530466 63% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 52.1666666667 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 8.0752688172 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1977.66487455 85% => OK
No of words: 332.0 407.700716846 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06927710843 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75532942723 2.67179642975 103% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 212.727598566 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518072289157 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 618.680645161 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.94265232975 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.1592905545 48.9658058833 139% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.2 100.406767564 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1333333333 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.45110844103 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 11.8709677419 17% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.85842293907 285% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258692825141 0.236089414692 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0982002387158 0.076458572812 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428955210962 0.0737576698707 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160834827808 0.150856017488 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470582591014 0.0645574589148 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 11.7677419355 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 58.1214874552 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.1575268817 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 10.9000537634 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.01818996416 101% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 86.8835125448 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.