It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone extreme changes and became more complex. There is no denying that our monumental scientific and technological achievements are thanks to educational system. A simple contemplation about the reason of why some countries are progressed and have thrived economy shows that they realized the importance of schools and academic centers and paid special attention to them. In this regard, the teachers as a flagship of this movement are at the top of the pyramid. Therefore, appreciating the dignity of the teacher, both materially and spiritually, is an indispensable issue. There is a strict controversy regarding whether to put maximum consideration on the human resources or on the other parts in an educational system. The following essay takes an elaborating look at the mentioned statement to reach a logical conclusion.
Believe it or not, the nation has superiority over others that benefit from the efficient educational program. To be a winner in this competition, there are two approaches; teachers play a game-changing role, facilities are a decisive factor. The advocates of the first model are in believe that teachers embody to the concept of schooling. If the teachers have a relaxed mind they transmit this calmness to the students and subsequently to the society. This is feasible when the government supports the teachers in all aspects, especially from the financial aspect. Just consider the condition in which the main concern of a teacher is providing financial security for handling family. The teacher is trying to spend a large proportion of his/her time to earning more money to meet existing needs. Obviously, in this case, there would be no time and motivation to find new methods in training; even though, the best training facilities be available.
On the other hand, the availability of modern training equipment is the prerequisite of every learning environment. Having outstanding teachers without possessing equipped labs, workshops, and even recreational centers would not lead to desired results. Indeed, it can be said that it is something like that you have and high-tech car but it doesn’t have gasoline to move. A research done on Toronto University shows that the schools in which the educational facilities are at a reasonable level breeds more creative students than others and 8 out of 10 them can attend at high-ranked universities. Admittedly, investing in the improvement of academic centers is not wasting national capital, but also is the best way to have a sustainable future.
To wrap it up, according to aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that enhancement of the teachers' income is not the only way for modification and improvement of the structure of training system, but certainly, it is the most efficient and fast way.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People would be happier with fewer possessions 59
- The extended family(grandparents, cousins, aunts, and uncles) is less important now than it was in the past. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? People would be happier withfewer possessions. 78
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement, Professional athletes, such football and basketball player, do not deserve the high salaries that they are paid. 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement. In order to succeed, you should be more like others than be different from everyone else. 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 502, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'breed'?
Suggestion: breed
...al facilities are at a reasonable level breeds more creative students than others and ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...sive conclusion that enhancement of the teachers income is not the only way for modifica...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 275, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... it is the most efficient and fast way.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, look, regarding, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 15.1003584229 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2442.0 1977.66487455 123% => OK
No of words: 465.0 407.700716846 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25161290323 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11374976882 2.67179642975 117% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550537634409 0.524837075471 105% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 618.680645161 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5404857998 48.9658058833 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.285714286 100.406767564 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.6045352989 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38095238095 5.45110844103 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.5376344086 54% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 11.8709677419 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.85842293907 26% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162999315862 0.236089414692 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419361380887 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289766596376 0.0737576698707 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950341373847 0.150856017488 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0175634336145 0.0645574589148 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.01818996416 118% => OK
difficult_words: 140.0 86.8835125448 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.002688172 120% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.