It goes without saying that, we as Homo sapiens, live in an age when our lifestyle has undergone profound changes and became more complex. By this definition, monumental scientific and technological achievements have brought us the ability to traveling every corner of the world. This capability, fast communication, caused to work in a place far from one's own town or even country. Indeed, due to the non-uniform dispersion of job opportunity all over the world and potential of success, the migration phenomenon emerged. The following essay takes an elaborating look at whether moving to the other place for attaining happiness is a decent decision or not.
There is no denying that the sense of ambition is laid in our creation that causes to be curious in finding ways ending prosperity. Admittedly, by having meticulous look over the past we can exactly pinpoint the historical milestone that outstanding progressions occurred, the reason is only migration. God has pointed in the Quran that we created the world broad enough when you found a place undesirable you have the right to choose another point. Although, leaving the native living place is emotionally painful and being apart from family is annoying, thinking to the supposed purpose is soothing.
Additionally, moving to select another spot for a living may have a political incentive. Since in somewhere activity of people with a certain attitude like artists, athletes, social activists, and environmentalists are banned or restricted. In fact, the established rules prevent them to pursue their affairs, accordingly they get frustrated and seeking an escape for releasing themselves from the current situation. Furthermore, in some other cases, the bad climate condition and low precipitation rate forces the agricultures to leave their ancestral grounds and find life elsewhere. A group of sociologists at, ANU University, performed an investigation to realize whether migration brings delight or not. The results determined that over 67 percent of immigrants are content.
To wrap it up, according to the aforementioned materials we can reach a conclusive conclusion that if we noticed our capabilities are ignored it means it's time to go. Definitely, the living motherland is difficult but sometimes the external factors overcome our intrinsic values. Assuredly, this the game that there is no real winner but the man how stay will lose.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to succeed in a new job, the ability to adapt oneself to the new environment is more important than having profound knowledge about this job. 81
- Which of the following would you most like to change to improve your health? The kind of food you eat, the amount of exercise or the level of stress. 78
- Agree or disagree Movies and TV programs made in your own country are more interesting comparing to movies and programs made in other countries 64
- 48. Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is important for governments to protect wild animals and wilderness areas for the future generations. 81
- Some people have ambitious dreams and keep following them, but other people always focus on realistic goals and try to achieve them. Which do you think is better? 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 602, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng to the supposed purpose is soothing. Additionally, moving to select another s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, if, look, may, so, apart from, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 9.8082437276 41% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.0286738351 91% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 43.0788530466 74% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 52.1666666667 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.0752688172 136% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2035.0 1977.66487455 103% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35526315789 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08244403337 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 212.727598566 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.663157894737 0.524837075471 126% => OK
syllable_count: 649.8 618.680645161 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 8.0 3.08781362007 259% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 3.51792114695 28% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0014917325 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.055555556 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 20.6045352989 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.45110844103 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.85842293907 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.08760715157 0.236089414692 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0216798367207 0.076458572812 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0203945244568 0.0737576698707 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.044191945989 0.150856017488 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0229064024233 0.0645574589148 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 58.1214874552 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.1575268817 125% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 10.9000537634 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.01818996416 123% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 86.8835125448 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 10.002688172 125% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.247311828 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.